<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PBES</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2209-2641</issn><eissn>2209-265X</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18063/PBES.v9i8.15161</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Audit Object Expansion and Theoretical Reconstruction in the Artificial Intelligence Era: From Information Assurance to Intelligent Governance Assurance</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/PBES/9/8/10.18063/PBES.v9i8.15161</url><author>XiaoXia</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>8</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-08-31</published-time></date></history><abstract>Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing both audit practice and the mechanisms that may require assurance. Recent research has developed along two related paths. AI for audit examines the use of AI, large language models, and intelligent agents in audit work. Audit of AI considers the auditability and independent evaluation of AI systems used by organizations. This paper connects these streams with established audit theory and develops Audit Object Expansion Theory. The central argument is that audit objects may expand when AI becomes material to an accountability relationship, its operation is difficult for users to observe, and suitable criteria and evidence make independent examination possible. In AI-enabled organizations, the audit boundary may extend from financial information and traditional controls to three nested objects: data, algorithms, and intelligent decision processes. Auditability determines whether this potential expansion can become actual audit scope. The paper then discusses theoretical reconstruction at three connected levels: audit object, audit process, and assurance objective. The final level extends the discussion from information assurance toward intelligent governance assurance. The basic logic of auditing remains unchanged, but its application changes when intelligent systems become part of the mechanisms that produce accountable outcomes.</abstract><keywords>Artificial intelligence, Audit object, Auditability, Theoretical reconstruction, Intelligent governance assurance</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] Issa H, Sun T, Vasarhelyi MA, 2016, Research Ideas for Artificial Intelligence in Auditing: The Formalization of Audit and Workforce Supplementation. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 13(2): 1&amp;ndash;20.
[2] Kokina J, Davenport TH, 2017, The Emergence of Artificial Intelligence: How Automation Is Changing Auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(1): 115&amp;ndash;122.
[3] Gu H, Schreyer M, Moffitt K, et al., 2024, Artificial Intelligence Co-Piloted Auditing. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 54: 100698.
[4] Kokina J, Blanchette S, Davenport TH, et al., 2025, Challenges and Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Auditing: Evidence from the Field. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 56: 100734.
[5] Xiong F, Han Q, Zhang C, 2026, Design AI Agent for Auditing: Applying Large Language Models (LLMs) and Retrieval Augmented Generations (RAG) to Audit Workflows. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 23(1): 189&amp;ndash;198.
[6] Li Y, Goel S, 2025, Artificial Intelligence Auditability and Auditor Readiness for Auditing Artificial Intelligence Systems. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 56: 100739.
[7] Alles MG, 2015, Drivers of the Use and Facilitators and Obstacles of the Evolution of Big Data by the Audit Profession. Accounting Horizons, 29(2): 439&amp;ndash;449.
[8] Brown-Liburd H, Issa H, Lombardi D, 2015, Behavioral Implications of Big Data's Impact on Audit Judgment and Decision Making and Future Research Directions. Accounting Horizons, 29(2): 451&amp;ndash;468.
[9] Kokina J, Blanchette S, Davenport TH, et al., 2025, Challenges and Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence in Auditing: Evidence from the Field. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 56: 100734.
[10] Torroba M, S&amp;aacute;nchez JR, L&amp;oacute;pez L, et al., 2025, Investigating the Impacting Factors for the Audit Professionals to Adopt Data Analysis and Artificial Intelligence: Empirical Evidence for Spain. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 56: 100738.
[11] Khatri V, Brown CV, 2010, Designing Data Governance. Communications of the ACM, 53(1): 148&amp;ndash;152.
[12] Raji ID, Smart A, White RN, et al., 2020, Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditing, Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 33&amp;ndash;44.
&amp;nbsp;</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
