<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CEF</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Contemporary Education Frontiers</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3029-1879</issn><eissn>3029-1860</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/CEF.v4i7.15966</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Research on the Construction of Wargame Culture in the New Era Based on War Mechanisms and Scientific Cognition</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/CEF/4/7/10.26689/CEF.v4i7.15966</url><author>ZhangFang,LeiYanan,DuanYingxin</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>7</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-07-26</published-time></date></history><abstract>The construction of wargame culture should take compliance with the objective mechanisms of war as its fundamental principle, mathematical-quantitative analysis as its foundational method, bilateral autonomous adversarial engagement as its practical form, and dialectical after-action review and iteration as its cognitive advancement path. It constitutes a distinctive military cultural paradigm that embodies scientific military thinking, integrates the science of command with the art of command, and facilitates the pre-practice of war. With the steady advancement of wargaming applications, the cultivation of wargame culture should fully unleash the core value of wargames in exploring the laws of war, validating tactical concepts, and shaping decision-making thinking, thereby providing cultural foundations for the transition of military training and preparedness from an experience-based judgment paradigm to a scientific operations research paradigm.</abstract><keywords>Wargame culture,War mechanisms,Scientific quantification,Adversarial gaming,Dialectical cognition,Science of command,Art of command,Realistic training</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] Tang ZJ, Xu XZ, 2022, Theory and Application of Tactical Wargaming. Ordnance Industry Press, Beijing.
[2] Li JJ, 1998, Military Strategic Thinking (Rev. ed.). Military Science Press, Beijing.
[3] Li MH, 2019, Victory Mechanisms of Intelligent Warfare. Frontline, (02): 2.
[4] Hu XF, Luo P, 2016, Wargaming: Innovation and Practice of Complex System Management. Command Control and Simulation, 38(06): 1&amp;ndash;5.
[5] Li H, Xia ZP, 2019, Discussion on the Application of Wargaming. National Defense, (04): 16&amp;ndash;18.
[6] Zhang YL, Ni L, Kong WH, et al., 2022, Understanding and Reflection on Practical Wargaming Issues. In Proc. 10th China Command and Control Conference. Beijing.
[7] Fu GM, Zhu K, Jian RG, 2020, Philosophical Reflections on the Balance between Combat Command Art and Engineering. National Defense Technology, (03): 122&amp;ndash;126.
[8] Huang YG, Ren FC, 2026, Scientifically Understanding the "Strengths" and "Limitations" of Wargaming. PLA Daily, 2026-03-02.
[9] Fu QY, 2025, Philosophical Reflections and Path Analysis on Wargaming Assessment. PLA Daily, 2025-11-06.
[10] Yang NZ, 2007, Virtual Wargaming: Wargames, Combat Simulation and Modeling. PLA Press, Beijing.
[11] Perla P, 1990, The Art of Wargaming: A Guide for Professionals and Hobbyists. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
