<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">EIR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Educational Innovation Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3029-1844</issn><eissn>3029-1852</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/EIR.v4i7.16067</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Grey–Copula Dynamic Prediction of Hidden Learning Risk in Vocational Mathematics under Generative AI</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/EIR/4/7/10.26689/EIR.v4i7.16067</url><author>WangYan</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>7</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-07-26</published-time></date></history><abstract>Generative AI can raise students&amp;rsquo; assignment marks while concealing a decline in their unaided problem solving. In vocational college mathematics, a semester supplies only twelve to sixteen weekly observations per student, so large-sample classifiers cannot be estimated reliably; risk appears as several indicators deteriorating together, so single-threshold rules overlook students approaching two limits at once; and dependence between indicators shifts once generative AI enters the classroom, so static models respond too slowly. This paper proposes a grey&amp;ndash;Copula dynamic prediction method built around these three constraints. Four weekly indicators operationalise hidden learning risk as two conjunctive events; an improved grey model produces one-step forecasts and threshold-crossing probabilities from a few weeks of data; a rolling-window Copula couples paired indicators and is re-estimated weekly; and joint probabilities are mapped onto a three-tier alert. In a simulation of 15 scenarios and 1,600 replications, the joint probabilities were better calibrated than threshold and single-indicator rules (Brier score 0.115 against 0.177 and 0.262), and the rolling window recovered the post-break dependence within about 2.5 weeks. The Copula layer improved recall more than calibration, and an autoregressive alternative forecast better. No classroom validation is claimed.</abstract><keywords>Generative artificial intelligence,Vocational college mathematics,Learning risk,Grey prediction model,Copula function</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] Bastani H, Bastani O, Sungu A, et al., 2025, Generative AI Without Guardrails Can Harm Learning: Evidence From High School Mathematics. PNAS, 122(26): e2422633122.
[2] Fan Y, Tang L, Le H, et al., 2025, Beware of Metacognitive Laziness: Effects of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Learning Motivation, Processes, and Performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2): 489&amp;ndash;530.
[3] Sklar A, 1959, Fonctions de R&amp;eacute;partition &amp;agrave; N Dimensions et Leurs Marges. Publications de l&amp;rsquo;Institut de Statistique de l&amp;rsquo;Universit&amp;eacute; de Paris, 8: 229&amp;ndash;231.
[4] Nelsen RB, 2006, An Introduction to Copulas. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
[5] Deng JL, 1982, Control Problems of Grey Systems. Systems &amp;amp; Control Letters, 1(5): 288&amp;ndash;294.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
