<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEDS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Global Education Development Study</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3083-3973</issn><eissn>3083-3965</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/GEDS.v2i2.15911</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>The Generative Paradigm of Co-Emergent Consciousness: Ontological Crisis and Renewal in the Age of AIGC</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/GEDS/2/2/10.26689/GEDS.v2i2.15911</url><author>ZhaoXin,LiuXianhui</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-10-29</published-time></date></history><abstract>This article examines the profound philosophical shift induced by the integration of AIGC into education. It argues that generative feedback mechanisms unsettle the long-standing human-centered model of learning, transforming consciousness from an internal attribute of the individual into a distributed network spanning teachers, students, and algorithms. Through cognitive, ontological, and subject-oriented analyses, the paper identifies structural ruptures involving the externalization of thought, the dissipative reorganization of educational order, and the relational reconfiguration of subjectivity. It further claims that education no longer operates outside generative processes; rather, it attains its very being within them as an ecology of co-emergent consciousness. Within this paradigm, ethics shifts from external regulation to the orchestration of generative conditions, while responsibility becomes distributed across multiple agents. The article concludes that the central question of the AIGC era moves from &amp;ldquo;What is learning?&amp;rdquo; to &amp;ldquo;Who qualifies as a learner?&amp;rdquo;, calling for a renewed understanding of freedom, responsibility, and subjectivity in generative educational environments.</abstract><keywords>AIGC, Externalized consciousness, Generative education, Posthuman subjectivity, Educational ontology</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ariwidodo E, 2023, An Educational Philosophy Perspective on Teaching in Contemporary Curriculum Development. Andragogi: Jurnal Diklat Teknis Pendidikan dan Keagamaan.
[2]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Barandiaran X, P'erez-Verdugo M, 2024, Generative Midtended Cognition and Artificial Intelligence. Thinging with Thinging Things, abs/2411.06812.
[3]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Zhao D, Lin Y, 2025, Developing a Nonlinear Learning Agent Model Driven by Generative Artificial Intelligence. 2025 2nd International Conference on Informatics Education and Computer Technology Applications (IECA), 26&amp;ndash;29.
[4]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Rivera-Novoa A, Arias D, 2025, Generative Artificial Intelligence and Extended Cognition in Science Learning Contexts. Science &amp;amp; Education.
[5]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Simmons A, 2012, Cartesian Consciousness Reconsidered. Philosopher's Imprint, 12.
[6]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Santos S, 2020, Posthuman Knowledge. Journal of Posthuman Studies.
[7]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; McNeill W, 2023, Saying the Unsayable: Heidegger on the Being-in-Itself of Beings. Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual.
[8]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Fingerhut J, 2021, Enacting Media. An Embodied Account of Enculturation Between Neuromediality and New Cognitive Media Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
[9]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Pavanini M, 2022, Multistability and Derrida&amp;rsquo;s Diff&amp;eacute;rance: Investigating the Relations Between Postphenomenology and Stiegler&amp;rsquo;s General Organology. Philosophy &amp;amp; Technology, 35.
[10] Wedel K, 2025, Contextual Memory Intelligence &amp;ndash; A Foundational Paradigm for Human-AI Collaboration and Reflective Generative AI Systems. ArXiv, abs/2506.05370.
[11] Yang L, Yuan Y, 2025, Application of AIGC in Teaching of Advanced Mathematics. Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research.
[12] Price G, 2019, &amp;ldquo;Accursed Time&amp;rdquo;: Gilles Deleuze&amp;rsquo;s Difference and Repetition and John McGahern&amp;rsquo;s That They May Face the Rising Sun. &amp;Eacute;tudes irlandaises.
[13] Georgiev D, Georgiev G, 2024, Dynamic Semantic Networks for Exploration of Creative Thinking. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 38.
[14] Winter C, 2017, Curriculum Policy Reform in an Era of Technical Accountability: &amp;lsquo;Fixing&amp;rsquo; Curriculum, Teachers and Students in English Schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49: 55&amp;ndash;74.
[15] Yamani A, Baslyman M, Ahmed M, 2025, Multi-Agent LLMs as Ethics Advocates in AI-Based Systems.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
