<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEDS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Global Education Development Study</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3083-3973</issn><eissn>3083-3965</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/GEDS.v2i2.15915</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Study on the Strategies for Improving the Application Ability of Three Unified Textbooks in Study Travel from the Perspective of Practical Course-Based on the Case Comparison of China, US and UK</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/GEDS/2/2/10.26689/GEDS.v2i2.15915</url><author>HuangXiaochen,ZouShiwen</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-10-29</published-time></date></history><abstract>Translating knowledge from the unified textbooks for Chinese Language, Morality and the Rule of Law, and History into practical capabilities and subject‑specific core competencies hinges on students&amp;rsquo; practical application of textbook content. As a vital carrier for comprehensive social‑practice curricula, study‑tour programmes offer a tangible pathway for textbook knowledge to enter real‑world contexts and achieve knowledge transfer and application. Grounded in constructivism, situated learning and core‑competency education theories, this paper draws on study‑tour practice cases from China, the United States and the United Kingdom. Adopting multiple research methods including case comparison, policy‑document review and in‑depth interviews, it dissects the internal mechanisms through which study‑tour activities facilitate students&amp;rsquo; practical use of the three sets of unified textbooks, and puts forward corresponding improvement strategies. The study finds that study‑tour programmes across the three countries differ in curriculum‑goal orientation, content‑organisation logic, implementation modalities and evaluation‑mechanism development, yet all follow the fundamental learning logic of &amp;ldquo;textbook knowledge‑real‑world context‑competence transformation&amp;rdquo;. Current domestic study‑tour practices are confronted with challenges such as low alignment between textbook knowledge points and study‑tour tasks and insufficient interdisciplinary curriculum design. Drawing on U.S. and British experience in interdisciplinary curriculum design, inquiry‑based learning organisation and process‑oriented assessment, a multi‑dimensional comprehensive evaluation mechanism can be established. The findings of this research provide references for integrating practical curricula at the basic‑education level with national unified textbooks, and deliver actionable practical insights for fostering students&amp;rsquo; textbook‑application competence and realising core‑competency‑oriented education.</abstract><keywords>Study‑tour, Unified textbooks for Chinese Language， Morality and the Rule of Law， and History, Textbook‑application competence, Practical‑oriented curriculum, International comparison</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Liu D, Yin Z, 2022, Spatial-Temporal Pattern Evolution and Mechanism Model of Tourism Ecological Security in China. Ecological Indicators, 139: 108933.
[2]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ma X, Sun B, Hou G, et al., 2021, Evaluation and Spatial Effects of Tourism Ecological Security in the Yangtze River Delta. Ecological Indicators, 131: 108190.
[3]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Zhu W, Shang F, 2021, Rural Smart Tourism Under the Background of Internet Plus. Ecological Informatics, 65: 101424.
[4]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Huang Z, 2020, Usability of Tourism Websites: A Case Study of Heuristic Evaluation. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 26(1&amp;ndash;2): 55&amp;ndash;91.
[5]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Mate-Sanchez-Val M, Aparicio-Serrano G, 2022, Seawater deterioration and the tourist beta convergence process: A geospatial big data analysis of the Spanish Mediterranean coast. Current Issues in Tourism, 25(18): 2922&amp;ndash;2938.
[6]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Mertena I, Kaaristo M, Edensor T, 2022, Tourist Skills. Annals of Tourism Research, 94: 103387.
[7]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Chang V, Li X, Zhang J, Xu Q, Valverde R F, 2022, Brand personality in cultural tourism and sustainable development by using big data analytics. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 16(1): 125&amp;ndash;139.
[8]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Zekan B, Weismayer C, Gunter U, et al., 2022, Regional Sustainability and Tourism Carrying Capacities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 339: 130624.
[9]&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Teng Y, Cox A, Chatziantoniou I, 2021, Environmental Degradation, Economic Growth and Tourism Development in Chinese Regions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(26): 33781&amp;ndash;33793.
[10] Io H, Lei S, Li Z, 2026, The Power of Storytelling in the Digital Age: A Multimodal Analysis of Persuasive Strategies and User Engagement in Tour Guide Influencer Content. Journal of China Tourism Research, 22(2): 518&amp;ndash;542.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
