<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IEF</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Education Forum</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3083-4902</issn><eissn>2981-8605</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/IEF.v4i10.16118</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Reform and Innovation of Course Assessment for Landscape Engineering Construction Technology: A Case Study of the Environmental Design Major at Chongqing Institute of Engineering</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/IEF/4/10/10.26689/IEF.v4i10.16118</url><author>LanNi,YangYizhou,GaoLinye</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>10</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-11-11</published-time></date></history><abstract>Aiming at the long-standing problems of application-oriented undergraduate environmental design courses relying on closed-book final written examinations and the disconnect between assessment content and construction post competency requirements, this paper takes the course Landscape Engineering Construction Technology at Chongqing Institute of Engineering as the object and reconstructs the course assessment system based on the Outcome-Based Education (OBE) concept: the closed-book written examination is abolished, and the overall grade is composed of after-class assignments, design schemes, and comprehensive assessment of the final project; group project-based assessment is carried out using real enterprise-commissioned horizontal projects as carriers; a multi-agent evaluation mechanism combining teacher evaluation, student peer evaluation, and AI-assisted evaluation is established; and the whole-process assessment data are retained on the Chaoxing Learning Platform. In response to remaining problems such as &amp;ldquo;free-riding&amp;rdquo; in groups, difficulty in monitoring the AI use process, and increased burden of assessment material archiving, improvement measures are proposed, including refining individual contribution evaluation, defining the boundaries of AI use, and adding special practical training in construction organization, so as to provide a reference for assessment reform of similar application-oriented courses.</abstract><keywords>Course assessment reform, Landscape Engineering Construction Technology, Outcome-based education, Project-based assessment</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, State Council, 2020, Overall Plan for Deepening the Reform of Educational Evaluation in the New Era. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-10/13/content_5551032.htm
[2] Ministry of Education, 2019, Implementation Opinions of the Ministry of Education on the Construction of First-Class Undergraduate Courses. https://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201910/t20191031_406269.html
[3] Li ZY, Zhu H, Liu ZJ, et al., 2014, Guiding Higher Engineering Education Teaching Reform with the Concept of Outcome-Based Education. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2014(2): 29&amp;ndash;34 + 70.
[4] Li ZY, 2020, The &amp;ldquo;Last Mile&amp;rdquo; of Professional Accreditation of Engineering Education in China. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2020(3): 1&amp;ndash;13.
[5] Chen L, 2007, Exploration of the N+2 Process Assessment Reform at Hefei University. Education and Vocation, 2007(32): 176&amp;ndash;178.
[6] Wang Z, Cao PG, Yang Y, 2026, Teaching Reform of Environmental Landscape Design Courses under the Background of Rural Revitalization. Modern Horticulture, 49(5): 176&amp;ndash;179 + 4.
[7] Zhang P, Wang Y, Shang JJ, 2024, Generative Artificial Intelligence and Educational Transformation: Values, Difficulties, and Strategies. Modern Educational Technology, 34(6): 14&amp;ndash;24.
[8] Sun XM, Qin YM, Zhou JP, 2026, Research on Course Assessment and Evaluation System Based on the Chaoxing Learning Platform: Taking the Biochemistry Course as an Example. Creative Education Studies, 14(9): 343&amp;ndash;350.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
