IEFInternational Education Forum3083-49022981-8605Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/IEF.v4i9.15732ArticleAI-Generated Feedback and English Majors’ Self-Efficacy: A Qualitative Study Based on Semi-Structured Interviewshttps://artdesignp.com/journal/IEF/4/9/10.26689/IEF.v4i9.15732ZhangQiyu,ChenYou2026492026-10-20This study aims to explore how AI-generated feedback influences English majors’ self-efficacy and to identify the psychological mechanisms through which such feedback shapes learners’ confidence, learning behaviors, and emotional experiences. A qualitative research method was employed to investigate English majors’ experiences and perceptions of AI-generated feedback. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 English-major undergraduates, and the interview data were analyzed through thematic analysis. The results show that AI-generated feedback influences learners’ self-efficacy through four interconnected pathways: cognitive, behavioral, emotional, and social. Cognitively, AI feedback enhances learners’ perceptions of competence by confirming their abilities and helping them recognize learning progress. Behaviorally, immediate feedback strengthens learners’ control over the learning process and promotes independent problem-solving. Emotionally, supportive and non-judgmental feedback can enhance confidence and motivation, whereas excessive or impersonal corrections may negatively affect self-efficacy. Socially, learners view AI-generated feedback and teacher feedback as complementary rather than competitive. The study suggests that a human-AI collaborative feedback model can better support English learning by combining the efficiency and immediacy of AI with teachers’ emotional support, professional judgment, and personalized guidance. These findings provide practical implications for the effective integration of generative AI into English education and for promoting learners’ self-efficacy and self-regulated learning.Generative artificial intelligence (AI), AI-generated feedback, English majors, Self-efficacy, Human-AI collaboration

[1] Bandura A, 1977, Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2): 191–215. [2] Kohnke L, Moorhouse BL, Zou D, 2023, ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal, 54(2): 537–550. [3] Barrot JS, 2023, Using ChatGPT for Second Language Writing: Pitfalls and Potentials. Assessing Writing, 2023(57): 100745. [4] O’Neill R, Russell A, 2019, Stop! Grammar Time: University Students’ Perceptions of the Automated Feedback Program Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1): 42–56. [5] Godwin-Jones R, 2022, Partnering with AI: Intelligent Writing Assistance and Instructed Language Learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2): 5–24. [6] Zhu X, Liu H, 2024, Exploring ChatGPT’s Role in the Process Genre Approach to Foreign Language Writing Pedagogy. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, 46(6): 30–36 + 109. [7] Li L, 2024, A Comparative Study of Effects of “Automated Writing Evaluation Feedback” and “Model Text Feedback” on College Students’ English Writing, thesis, Jilin University. [8] Bandura A, 1997, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Macmillan. [9] Bandura A, Hall P, 2018, Albert Bandura and Social Learning Theory. In Learning Theories for Early Years (pp. 35–36). SAGE Publications, California. [10] Pajares F, 2003, Self-efficacy Beliefs, Motivation, and Achievement in Writing: A Review of the Literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2): 139–158. [11] Mills N, Pajares F, Herron C, 2007, Self-efficacy of College Intermediate French Students: Relation to Achievement and Motivation. Language Learning, 57(3): 417–442. [12] Li B, Xu J, 2014, Achievement Goals Orientation and Autonomous English Learning Ability: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy. Foreign Languages in China, 11(3): 59–68. [13] Yang H, 2025, The Relationship between Self-Efficacy and L2 Willingness to Communicate: The Mediating Effects of Foreign Language Learning Pride and Shyness, thesis, Qingdao University of Science and Technology. [14] Klassen RM, 2004, Optimism and Realism: A Review of Self-efficacy from a Cross-Cultural Perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 39(3): 205–230. [15] Ghorbanzadeh Savar M, Yazdani H, Farahani E, 2026, The effect of self-regulated use of ChatGPT on the Paragraph Writing Skills and Self-efficacy of Iranian EFL Learners. Technology Assisted Language Education, 4(2): 27–48. [16] Huang G, Chen H, 2026, Beyond Grammar: How ChatGPT-4.0 Shapes Writing Self-Efficacy and Performance in CSL Writing. Language Learning & Technology, 30(1): 1–23. [17] Zhai C, Wibowo S, Li LD, 2024, The Effects of Over-Reliance on AI Dialogue Systems on Students’ Cognitive Abilities: A Systematic Review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1): 28. [18] Zawacki-Richter O, Marín VI, Bond M, et al., 2019, Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1): 1–27. [19] Holmes W, Porayska-Pomsta K, Holstein K, et al., 2022, Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2022(32): 504–526. [20] Li C, Mutlu AK, 2025, The Interplay of Personal Learning Experience, Social Emotional Learning and Autonomy in Promoting Well-Being in AI-Assisted Language Learning: A Self-Determination Theory Approach. European Journal of Education, 60(4): e70354. [21] Lan Y, Liu S, Chen H, 2026, The Effects of Responsiveness, Perceived Warmth, and Anthropomorphism on University Students’ Use of Conversational AI for Learning Support: A Chain Mediation Analysis Based on SOR Framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 2026(17): 1769964. [22] Luckin R, Holmes W, 2016, Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. UCL Knowledge Lab. [23] Yu Y, Rao H, 2023, College Foreign Language Teachers’ Role Crisis and Identity Reshaping in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, 45(3): 79–85 + 124. [24] Braun V, Clarke V, 2006, Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101.