JCERJournal of Contemporary Educational Research2208-84662208-8474Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/JCER.v10i9.15648ArticleSystematic Design of Teaching Model Reform for the Tax Law Course Based on the ADDIE Modelhttps://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/10/9/10.26689/JCER.v10i9.15648LiYuxue20261092026-09-30The digital economy has imposed compound competency requirements on the tax literacy of accounting and finance professionals. However, traditional Tax Law instruction faces three structural predicaments: insufficient learning motivation, the dual complexity of the knowledge system, and difficulty in disciplinary thinking transition. This study employs the ADDIE model as a systematic instructional design framework to construct a task-driven and values-infused blended teaching model in response to these challenges. Guided by the five-phase logic of ADDIE—Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation—the model establishes a learner-centered, task-anchored, and values-oriented instructional design loop through five interrelated components: learner analysis and needs diagnosis, modularized content restructuring, multi-tiered task packages and case resource development, full-process blended teaching implementation, and diversified formative evaluation. The model effectively bridges the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application while integrating professional competence development with values cultivation, thereby offering a replicable practical paradigm for the systematic teaching reform of business and finance courses.ADDIE model, Tax Law course, Task-driven learning, Values infusion, Teaching reform

[1] Annelin A, Boström G-O, 2023, An Assessment of Key Sustainability Competencies: A Review of Scales and Propositions for Validation. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(9): 53–69. [2] Leicht A, Heiss J, Byun WJ, 2018, Issues and Trends in Education for Sustainable Development, Paris: UNESCO Publishing. [3] Aldoobie N, 2023, Educational Design and Evaluation Models of the Learning Effectiveness in E-Learning Process: A Systematic Review. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(4): 318–347. [4] Miller WF, Shawver TJ, Mintz SM, 2024, An Empirical Analysis of the Theoretical Foundation of the Giving Voice to Values Pedagogy. Accounting Education, 33(3): 319–337. [5] Fogarty TJ, Sellers RD, Jones DE, 2023, Reverse Engineering Tax Education: How Tax Practice Can Inform the Classroom Experience. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(1): 16. [6] Hawk H, 2025, Unlocking the Potential: Enhancing Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Accounting Education. Accounting Education, 34(6): 998–1025. [7] Bloom BS, 1956, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, New York: David McKay. [8] Lave J, Wenger E, 1991, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [9] Wang Y, 2023, Task-Driven Teaching and Its Application in Business English Course. Journal of Higher Education Research, 44(2): 112–118. [10] McCall M, Shelton RN, Crowley BN, et al., 2023, Doctoral Student Perceptions of a Project-Based Learning Approach in an Instructional Design Course. Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice, 8(3): 1–9.