<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AOGR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Obstetrics and Gynecology Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3083-4872</issn><eissn>2981-8060</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/aogr.v2i1.6223</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Attitudes Towards Family Planning of Women in the Early Postpartum Period and Effecting Factors – A Secondary Publication</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/AOGR/2/1/10.26689/aogr.v2i1.6223</url><author>TuranZeliha,KorukFatma</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2024-02-23</published-time></date></history><abstract>Objective: To determine the attitudes of women in the early postpartum period towards family planning and the factors affecting them. Method: The sample of the cross-sectional study consisted of 243 women in the postpartum clinics of a public hospital. Data for the study were collected between June and July 2022. Results: The average age of women was 28.17 ± 5.42 years, and the average number of children was 3.51 ± 0.89. In addition, 46.5% of women were illiterate and 73.7% want children again. The mean score of the women’s family planning attitude scale was 90.8 ± 8.10. The family planning attitude scale average scores of women with higher education levels, living in the city center, and having their pregnancy follow-up done in a private hospital were higher. It was determined that the mean score of the scale was lower for women with a higher age at their own age, spouse’s age, age at marriage and first gestational age, and women who want to have children again (P &amp;lt; 0.05). Conclusion: The research showed that women’s attitudes towards family planning in the early postpartum period were positive, but not at the desired level.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>World Health Organization (WHO), Maternal Mortality, viewed 10 October 2022, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health, Health Statistics Yearbook 2018, viewed 10 October 2022, https://sbsgm.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/36134/0/siy2018trpdf.pdf</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>World Health Organization (WHO), Family Planning/Contraception Methods, viewed 10 October 2022, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception%20%20/</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 2018. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Ankara, Turkey, viewed 10 October 2022, http://www.sck.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/TNSA2018_ana_Rapor.pdf</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Tezel A, Gönenç I, Akgun S, et al., 2015, Kadinlarin Aile Planlamasina Yönelik Tutumlari ve Etkileyen Faktörler [Women’s Attitudes Towards Family Planning and Influencing Factors]. Anadolu Hemsirelik ve Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.17049/ahsbd.23634.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Örsal Ö, Kubilay G, 2007, Aile Planlamasi Tutum Ölçeginin Gelistirilmesi [Development of the Family Planning Attitude Scale]. Florence Nightingale J Nurs, 15(60): 155–164.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Senturk Erenel A, Kavlak T, Bingöl B, 2011, Kadinlarin Dogum Sonrasi Alti ay Sonunda Aile Planlamasi Yöntemi Kullanma Durumu [Women’s Use of Family Planning Methods Six Months After Childbirth]. Van Med J, 2(18): 68–76.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Darney BG, Saavedra-Avendano B, Sosa-Rubi SG, et al., 2016, Comparison of Family-Planning Service Quality Reported by Adolescents and Young Adult Women in Mexico. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 134: 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.12.003</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>James S, Toombs M, Brodribb W, 2018, Barriers and Enablers to Postpartum Contraception Among Aboriginal Australian Women: Factors Influencing Contraceptive Decisions. Aust J Prim Health, 24(3): 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY17041</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yuvaci HU, Cevrioglu AS, 2017, Emzirme ve Aile Planlamasi [Breastfeeding and Family Planning]. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Pediatric Nursing – Special Topics, 3(2): 104–111.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Turkish Statistical Institute (TÜ?K) News Bulletin. Birth Statistics, 2021, viewed 11 October 2022, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Dogum-Istatistikleri-2021-45547</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Eryilmaz N, Ege E, 2016, Dogum Sonu Dönemdeki Kadinlarin Aile Planlamasi Konusundaki Tutumlari ve Iliskili Faktörler [Attitudes of Women Towards Family Planning During the Postpartum Period and Related Factors]. Journal of Human Sciences. 13(2): 3389–3401. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v13i2.3812</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Gavas E, Inal S, 2019, Turkiye’de Kadinlarin Aile Planlamasi Yöntemleri Kullanma Durumlari ve Tutumlari: Sistematik Derleme [The Status and Attitudes of Women Towards Family Planning Methods in Turkey: A Systematic Review]. Saglik ve Yasam Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(2): 37–43. https://doi.org/10.33308/2687248X.201912118</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Egelioglu Cetisli N, Kahveci M, Isik S, et al., 2020, Kadinlarin Postpartum Kontraseptif Tercihleri ve Tutumlari [Women’s Postpartum Contraceptive Preferences and Attitudes]. Journal of Academic Research in Nursing. 6(1): 67–72. https://doi.org/10.5222/jaren.2020.37233</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Nazik F, Mumcu S, Sönmez M, et al., 2021, 15–49 Yas Evli Kadinlarin Aile Planlamasina Iliskin Tutumlarinin Belirlenmesi [Determination of Attitudes Towards Family Planning Among Married Women Aged 15–49]. Ordu Üniversitesi Hemsirelik Çalismalari Dergisi, 4(3): 326–336. https://doi.org/10.38108/ouhcd.881578</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Avci S, Mutlu S, Yigit F, 2021, Evli Kadinlarin Aile Planlamas? Yöntem Tercihlerine EtkiEden Faktörler [Factors Influencing Married Women’s Family Planning Method Preferences]. Ebelik ve Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2): 128–138.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Varol ZS, Çiçeklioglu M, Taner S, 2019, Postpartum Dönemdeki Kadinlarin Aile Planlamasi Tutum Ölçeginin Gelistirilmesi [Development of the Postpartum Women’s Family Planning Attitude Scale], specialization thesis, Ege Üniversitesi.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Gözukara F, Kabalcioglu F, Ersin F, 2015, Sanliurfa Ilinde Kadinlarin Aile Planlamasina Iliskin Tutumlarinin Belirlenmesi [Determination of Women’s Attitudes Towards Family Planning in Sanliurfa Province]. Harran Üniversitesi Tip Fakultesi Dergisi, 12(1): 9–16.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bucak F, Kahraman S, 2022, Mevsimlik Tarim Isçisi Gebe Kadinlarin Aile Planlamasina Yönelik Tutumlarinin Belirlenmesi [Determination of Seasonal Agricultural Worker Pregnant Women’s Attitudes Towards Family Planning]. Gevher Nesibe Tip ve Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(7): 61–66. https://doi.org/10.46648/gnj.89</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20" content-type="article"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Mukhopadhyay P, Chaudhuri RN, Paul B, 2020, Hospital-Based Perinatal Outcomes and Complications in Teenage Pregnancy in India. J Health Popul Nutr, 28(5): 494–500. https://doi.org/10.3329/jhpn.v28i5.6158.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21" content-type="article"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Mutihir JT, Eko P, 2011, Stillbirths at the Jos University Teaching Hospital: Incidence, Risk, and Etiological Factors. Niger J Clin Pract, 14(1): 14–18. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.79233</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B22" content-type="article"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen CW, Tsai CY, Sung FC, et al., 2010, Adverse Birth Outcomes Among Pregnancies of Teen Mothers: Age Specific Analysis of National Data in Taiwan. Child: Care, Health and Development, 36(2): 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01039.x</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B23" content-type="article"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Çitak Bilgin N, Tokur Kesgin M, 2020, Kanatli Sektörunde Çalisan Kadinlarin Aile Planlamasi ve Acil Kontrasepsiyona Iliskin Bilgi ve Tutumlarinin Belirlenmesi [Determination of Knowledge and Attitudes of Women Working in the Poultry Sector Regarding Family Planning and Emergency Contraception]. Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi, 29(2): 123–132. https://doi.org/10.34108/eujhs.754337</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B24" content-type="article"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bongaarts J, Watkins SC, 1996, Social Interactions and Contemporary Fertility Transitions. Population and Development Review, 22(4): 639–682.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B25" content-type="article"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Turk R, Terzioglu F, 2019, Attitudes of Couples Towards Withdrawal Method in Birth Control. Cukurova Medical Journal, 44(3): 794–803. https://doi.org/10.17826/CUMJ.444467</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B26" content-type="article"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Erdogan N, Tuncer G, 2016, Kamu Saglik Hizmetlerinde Koniklik Etkisi: Ikili Lojistik Regresyon Analizi [Conicity Effect in Public Health Services: Binary Logistic Regression Analysis]. Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges, 6(2): 67–72.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B27" content-type="article"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Mavi Aydogdu SG, Akça E, 2018, Amasya il Merkezindeki Aile Sagligi Merkezleri’ne Basvurankadinlarin Aile Planlamasi Yöntem Kullanimi ve Etkileyen Faktörler [Use of Family Planning Methods and Influencing Factors Among Women Applying to Family Health Centers in the City Center of Amasya. Surekli Tip Egitimi Dergisi, 27(6): 384–391.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
