AOGRAdvances in Obstetrics and Gynecology Research3083-48722981-8060Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/aogr.v4i1.14099ArticleThe Value of 3D-TVS OmniView Imaging Technology Combined with Tomographic Imaging in the Diagnosis of Intrauterine Adhesionshttps://artdesignp.com/journal/AOGR/4/1/10.26689/aogr.v4i1.14099WangJun,SongJing2026412026-03-10Objective: To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of 3D-TVS OmniView imaging technology combined with tomographic imaging in patients with intrauterine adhesions (IUA). Methods: A total of 150 suspected IUA patients admitted to our hospital and confirmed by hysteroscopy were selected as the study sample from January 2024 to December 2025. All patients underwent preoperative 3D-TVS OmniView imaging scans, and the tomographic imaging mode was employed to observe linear interruptions of the endometrium, alterations in uterine cavity morphology, and adhesion bands. The results of hysteroscopy were used as the “gold standard” for this study, and the diagnostic efficacy of 3D-TVS alone versus 3D-TVS OmniView imaging combined with tomographic imaging in diagnosing IUA was compared. Results: Among the 150 patients, hysteroscopy diagnosed a total of 112 cases (74.7%) of IUA. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 3D-TVS alone in diagnosing IUA were 82.1%, 78.4%, and 81.0%, respectively; whereas the sensitivity of 3D-TVS OmniView imaging combined with tomographic imaging significantly increased to 93.7%, with a specificity of 89.2% and an accuracy of 92.0%, all of which were significantly higher than those of 3D-TVS alone (P < 0.05). In terms of adhesion degree identification, combined imaging demonstrated higher consistency in judging moderate and severe adhesions (κ = 0.82), particularly in displaying deformations of the uterine cavity contour, adhesion bridges, and focal atresia with greater clarity. Conclusion: The implementation of 3D-TVS OmniView combined with tomographic imaging in patients with intrauterine adhesions yields higher diagnostic accuracy. This non-invasive, intuitive imaging method holds significant clinical value and can serve as an important screening tool prior to hysteroscopy, meriting widespread adoption and application.

Li M, Qu W, Ma F, 2025, Clinical Value of 3D-TVS OmniView Combined with TUI in the Diagnosis of Intrauterine Adhesions. Journal of Medical Imaging, 35(2): 163–166.

Qin C, Wu Y, Wei L, et al., 2025, Diagnosis of Intrauterine Adhesions Using Transvaginal Two-Dimensional Ultrasound Combined with Three-Dimensional Ultrasound OmniView Imaging. Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology, 41(2): 300–303.

Liu X, 2024, Exploring the Value of Transvaginal Two-Dimensional Combined with Three-Dimensional Ultrasound OmniView Imaging Technology in the Diagnosis of Intrauterine Adhesions. Journal of Primary Medicine Forum, 28(18): 46–48 + 73.

Xu Y, Liu X, Bai M, 2024, Value of Intracavitary Three-Dimensional Ultrasound OmniView Imaging Technology Combined with Intracavitary Two-Dimensional Ultrasound High-Resolution Blood Flow Imaging Technology in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Intrauterine Polypoid Lesions. Electronic Journal of Comprehensive Cancer Therapy, 10(3): 85–93.

Jiang Y, 2024, Diagnostic Value of Transvaginal Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Volume Imaging Combined with Tomographic Ultrasound Imaging in Intrauterine Adhesions. Contemporary Medicine, 30(15): 159–161.

Ouyang X, Yi F, Zou Y, 2023, Exploring the Value of 3D-TVS Render Imaging Combined with OmniView Technology in the Diagnosis of Intrauterine Adhesions. Medical Innovation of China, 20(9): 125–128.

Wang L, Gu Y, Li H, et al., 2021, Comparative Study on the Application Value of Different Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging Modes in the Diagnosis of Intrauterine Adhesions. Journal of Medical Imaging, 31(4): 715–719.

Gao J, Ayixiemuguli M, Ayijiamali Y, et al., 2025, Application Value of Transvaginal Three-Dimensional Ultrasound OmniView Imaging Combined with Volume Contrast Imaging in the Diagnosis and Pathological Classification Evaluation of Intrauterine Adhesions. Clinical Journal of Military Medicine, 53(8): 856–859.