BASBone and Arthrosurgery Science3083-48562981-8222Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/bas.v4i2.14748ArticleSingle-Row Versus Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Structural Integrity and Functional Outcomeshttps://artdesignp.com/journal/BAS/4/2/10.26689/bas.v4i2.14748Delger,WuXiubin2026422026-05-14Background: Double-row rotator cuff repair is often used to improve tendon healing. However, its effect on clinical outcomes is still not clearly established. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed following PRISMA guidelines. This study compared single-row and double-row repair. Structural integrity and functional outcomes were evaluated. Structural failure was defined as any non-intact repair, including both partial- and full-thickness defects. Odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Eight comparative studies were included. Six contributed to structural analysis, and six reported functional outcomes. Among these, four were included in the quantitative synthesis for functional results. Structural failure occurred in 42.7% of shoulders after single-row repair and 26.4% after double-row repair. This corresponds to an absolute reduction of about 16%, which is significant in practice. Double-row repair reduced the risk of structural failure (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.75; I2 = 0%). In contrast, postoperative Constant scores were similar between groups (MD −0.08, 95% CI −3.98 to 3.82; I2 = 0%). Conclusion: Double-row repair improves structural integrity. But it does not seem to improve functional outcomes, at least within the current sample size. This indicates that structural healing and clinical recovery may not fully align.

Franceschi F, Ruzzini L, Longo UG, et al., 2007, Equivalent Clinical Results of Arthroscopic Single-Row and Double-Row Suture Anchor Repair for Rotator Cuff Tears: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 35(8): 1254–1260.

Burks RT, Crim J, Brown N, et al., 2009, A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Arthroscopic Single- and Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Early Clinical Evaluation. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 37(4): 674–682.

Koh KH, Kang KC, Lim TK, et al., 2011, Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Single-Versus Double-Row Suture Anchor Repair in 2- to 4-cm Rotator Cuff Tears: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 27(4): 453–462.

Ma HL, Chiang ER, Wu HTH, et al., 2012, Clinical Outcome and Imaging of Arthroscopic Single-Row and Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 28(1): 16–24.

Lapner PL, Sabri E, Rakhra K, et al., 2012, A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Single-Row with Double-Row Fixation in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. JBJS, 94(14): 1249–1257.

Charousset C, Grimberg J, Duranthon LD, et al., 2007, Can a Double-Row Anchorage Technique Improve Tendon Healing in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair? A Prospective, Nonrandomized, Comparative Study of Double-Row and Single-Row Anchorage Techniques with Computed Tomographic Arthrography Tendon Healing Assessment. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 35(8): 1247–1253.

Grasso A, Milano G, Salvatore M, et al., 2009, Single-Row Versus Double-Row Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 25(1): 4–12.

Aydin N, Kocaoglu B, Guven O, 2010, Single-Row Versus Double-Row Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Small- to Medium-Sized Tears. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 19(5): 722–725.

Carbonel I, Martinez AA, Calvo A, et al., 2012. Single-Row Versus Double-Row Arthroscopic Repair in the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study. International Orthopaedics, 36(9): 1877–1883.

Imam M, Sallam A, Ernstbrunner L, et al., 2020. Three-Year Functional Outcome of Transosseous-Equivalent Double-Row vs. Single-Row Repair of Small and Large Rotator Cuff Tears: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 29(10): 2015–2026.