erdEducation Reform and Development2652-53642652-5372Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/erd.v6i3.6646ArticleStudy of The Resolution of English Relative Clause Attachment Ambiguities by Trilingual Learnershttps://artdesignp.com/journal/erd/6/3/10.26689/erd.v6i3.6646WangJie,JiangChengjun2024632024-03-29The study of the relative clause (RC) attachment is important in revealing the internal psychological processes of processing ambiguous sentences. It is worth exploring whether the existing attachment hypotheses apply to second and third-language learners. This study used an offline sentence acceptance test method to conduct a relative clause attachment ambiguity bias experiment on 35 Chinese students whose second language is English and whose third language is Thai. Research has shown that the subjects do not exhibit a significant attachment bias when processing ambiguous sentences related to English and Thai relative clauses with the NP1 of NP2-RC structure, but exhibited significant proximity bias when processing ambiguous sentences with the NP1 of NP2-RC structure.

Cheng Y, Rothman J, Cunnings I, 2021, Parsing preferences and individual differences in nonnative sentence processing: Evidence from eye movements [J]. Applied Psycholinguistics, 42(1): 129–151.

Wang J, Singhapreecha P, 2022, High Attachment in Thai Learners’ Processing of English Relative Clauses. LEARN Journal, 15(2): 263–299.

Shen G, Scheepers C, Yao B, n.d., “Cross-linguistic Priming of Relative Clause Attachments in Mandarin-English Bilinguals – the Effects of Branching Direction and Second Language Proficiency.” PsyArXiv, viewed 9 November, 2023.

Gibson E, Pearlmutter N, Canseco-Gonzalez E, et al., 1996, Recency Preferences in The Human Sentence Processing Mechanism. Cognition, 59(1): 23–59.

Akal T, 2021, Recency Preference in Ambiguous Relative Clause Attachment in Turkish. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1): 139–159.

Frazier L, Clifton C, 1996, Construal, MIT Press, United States.

Gilboy E, Sopena J, Clifton C, et al., 1995, Argument Structure and Association Preferences in Spanish and English Complex NPs. Cognition, 54(2): 131–167.

Jennifer R, Zhang J, 2022, A Study on the NP Attachment Preference of Tagalog-Dominant and Chinese-Dominant Bilinguals. Journal of English and Applied Linguistics, 1(1): 114–112.

Karimi M, Samadi E, Babaii E, 2021, Relative Clause Attachment Ambiguity Resolution in L1-Persian Learners of L2 English: The Effects of Semantic Priming and Proficiency. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 8(1): 153–185.

Marefat H, Farzizadeh B, 2018, Relative Clause Ambiguity Resolution in L1 and L2: Are Processing Strategies Transferred. Applied Linguistics, 21(1): 125–161.

Sokolova M, Slabakova RA, 2022, Different Type of RC Attachment Resolution: Comparing Bilingual and Trilingual Processing. Generative SLA in the Age of Minimalism, 2022: 287–314.

Chen S, 2018, A Study on The Ambiguity Resolution of English Relative Clauses by Mongolian Trilingual Learners, dissertation, Inner Mongolia Normal University.

Dussias PE, 2003, Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in L2 Learners: Some Effects of Bilinguality on L1 and L2 Processing Strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(4): 529–557.