erdEducation Reform and Development2652-53642652-5372Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/erd.v8i1.13730ArticleResearch on the Integration and Practice Path of Marker-Assisted Selection Technology in Higher Vocational Agricultural Educationhttps://artdesignp.com/journal/erd/8/1/10.26689/erd.v8i1.13730WenShaozhe2026812026-02-04With the rapid development of modern biotechnology, marker-assisted selection (MAS) technology has become a core tool in the field of crop genetic breeding, driving the seed industry towards precision and efficiency. As the main position for cultivating technical and skilled talents, higher vocational education must actively adapt to industrial technological changes and integrate such cutting-edge technologies into the teaching system. Focusing on the teaching integration of marker-assisted selection technology in higher vocational agricultural majors, this paper analyzes the current application status and challenges of the technology in higher vocational agricultural education, expounds its important value in improving students’ technical application capabilities and aligning with the needs of the modern seed industry, and proposes a systematic integration practice path from aspects such as curriculum system reconstruction, teaching resource development, teacher capability improvement, industry-university-research collaboration, and teaching method innovation, aiming to provide reference for the teaching reform of higher vocational agricultural majors.

Xu C, Mo H, 1996, Marker-Assisted Selection for Quantitative Trait Genes. Hereditas, 1996, 18(Supplement): 74–80.

Collard BCY, Mackill DJ, 2008, Marker-Assisted Selection: An Approach for Precision Plant Breeding in the Twenty-First Century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1491): 557–572.

Zhang T, 2011, General Theory of Crop Breeding. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, 250–268.

Zhao C, 2021, Development Status and Future Prospects of Smart Agriculture. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 42(6): 1–7.

European Commission, 2021, Modernising Higher Education in Agriculture: A Comparative Study of Curricular Reform in the EU. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

Zhang M, Li H, 2022, Exploration of the “Post-Course-Competition-Certificate” Integrated Talent Training Model for Biotechnology Majors in Agricultural Higher Vocational Colleges——Taking Jiangsu Agri-animal Husbandry Vocational College as an Example. Chinese Vocational and Technical Education, 2022(17): 88–92.

Wang J, Li J, Zhao H, 2019, Research Progress and Application Prospects of Marker-Assisted Selection Breeding Technology. Crops, 2019(4): 1–7.

Zeng R, Zhang Z, Wang J, 2020, Research and Practice on the “Project-Based, Modular” Teaching Reform in Higher Vocational Education. Chinese Vocational and Technical Education, 2020(29): 72–76.

Li Z, Yang K, 2020, Construction of “Dual-Qualified” Teachers in Higher Vocational Colleges: Connotation Reconstruction and Path Innovation. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2020(5): 138–143.

Liu B, Wu J, 2021, Practical Exploration on Cultivating Students’ Innovative Ability in Higher Vocational Biotechnology Majors Under the Concept of Integration of Science and Education. Vocational and Technical Education, 42(17): 55–59.

State Council, 2019, Notice of the Implementation Plan for the Reform of National Vocational Education (Guo Fa[2019]No. 4).

Sun S, 2019, Several Understandings on the “1+X” Certificate System. Chinese Vocational and Technical Education, 2019(7): 72–76.

Liu X, Li H, 2021, Research on the Application of Virtual Simulation Technology in Higher Vocational Practical Teaching. Research and Exploration in Laboratory, 40(4): 231–234.

Ding J, 2012, Exploration on the School-Running Model of Higher Vocational Education Based on Industry-University-Research Collaboration. Educational Research, 33(7): 98–102.

Shi W, Hao T, 2021, From “Making Tools” to “Cultivating People”: The Logical Turn and Path Choice of Vocational Education Evaluation Reform. Educational Research, 42(3): 115–126.