<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">erd</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Education Reform and Development</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2652-5364</issn><eissn>2652-5372</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/erd.v8i4.14519</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Exploring the Teaching Path of the Systems Engineering Course Empowered by Generative Artificial Intelligence</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/erd/8/4/10.26689/erd.v8i4.14519</url><author>WangYu-bin,GaoFang-jie,LiZhen-hua</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-05-26</published-time></date></history><abstract>The rapid growth of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has created both new opportunities and problems for instructional change in higher education. Systems Engineering, a key methodology course for “engineering management” postgraduates, aims to develop students’ abilities to understand and solve complex engineering problems using systematic thinking. However, persistent obstacles in teaching practice have long existed, including abstract theoretical concepts, methodologies with limited transferability to real-world circumstances, insufficient customized assistance, boring teaching forms, and strict evaluation practices. Taking the course of Systems Engineering as the research object, this study analyzes the course’s characteristics and teaching pain points. An overall framework is proposed, which centers on “human-machine collaboration”, with “pre-class, in-class, post-class” as the main line, and encompassing the dimensions of “teacher, student, and course assessment”. Based on this approach, we explain how GenAI might be integrated into the teaching of Systems Engineering from each of the three perspectives of teacher, student, and course assessment. This investigation is expected to serve as a reference for teaching reform in engineering management courses, aid in the development of compound engineering talents with systematic thinking ability, and contribute to the development of “new business” talents in the digital economy.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang S, Meng L, Liu J, et al., 2025, DeepSeek in the Classroom—Exploration and Reflection on the Application of AI Agents in the Teaching of Organ-System Integrated Courses. China Medical Education Technology, 39(4): 432–436.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ma G, Tian S, Song Y, et al., 2025, When Technology Meets Anxiety: The Moderating Role of AI Usage in the Relationship Between Social Anxiety, Learning Adaptability, and Behavioral Problems Among Chinese Primary School Students. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 18: 151–167.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Liu H, Jia J, 2026, The Internal Mechanism and Teaching Suggestions of Generative Artificial Intelligence Promoting Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Development—Based on the Construction of IRIT Model. China Medical Education Technology, 40(2): 81–87.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>People’s Republic of China, 2026, The Outline of the 15th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development. People’s Publishing House, Beijing.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wu X, 2025, Research on Teaching Innovation and Practice of Systems Engineering Course under the Background of New Engineering. Logistics Engineering and Management, 47(10): 169–171.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>He Q, Chen W, Wang T, 2017, Reform and Exploration of Postgraduate Course Teaching of Systems Engineering—Taking the School of Management, Guizhou University as an Example. Logistics Engineering and Management, 39(2): 200–202.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Huang J, Lü W, Zhao R, et al., 2026, Ideological and Political Teaching Design of Systems Engineering Course. Higher Education Forum, 12(S1): 191–196.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Xu C, Yang K, 2024, Exploration on Online Course Construction and Teaching Reform for Master of Logistics Engineering and Management—Taking “Systems Engineering” as an Example. Logistics Research, (6): 87–89.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang H, Li X, 2024, Research on Systems Engineering Teaching Reform Based on OBE-BOPPPS Mode under the Background of Informatization. Theory and Practice of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7(4): 47–49 + 65.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hu L, 2023, Research on Hybrid Teaching Mode of Basic Disciplinary Courses for Logistics Engineering Major—Taking Systems Engineering as an Example. China Storage &amp; Transport, (8): 192–193.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Fu Q, 2026, Exploration on Teaching Reform of Master of Finance Professional Courses Empowered by Artificial Intelligence—Taking “Corporate Finance” as an Example. Heilongjiang Education (Theory and Practice), 2026: 1–4.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Guo J, Liu C, Wu L, et al., 2026, Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Teaching of Food Quality and Safety Courses. Journal of Huaibei Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2026: 1–7.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zheng Y, Gao Y, Gu C, et al., 2024, Analysis of Project-Based Teaching Mode of Introduction to Systems Engineering Course Based on Reverse Design. Integrated Circuit Application, 41(12): 424–429.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
