<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IEF</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Education Forum</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3083-4902</issn><eissn>2981-8605</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/ief.v3i4.10397</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>A Review of Comparative Studies on the Similarities and Differences between Situational Teaching Method and Task-Based Teaching Method</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/IEF/3/4/10.26689/ief.v3i4.10397</url><author>LiXi,CiXiangyi</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-04-28</published-time></date></history><abstract>Both situational language teaching and task-based language teaching occupy important positions in modern education. Situational language teaching relies on creating realistic scenarios to evoke emotional resonance among students and drive the internalization of knowledge. Task-based language teaching, on the other hand, is guided by clear tasks, urging students to master knowledge and skills in the process of completing tasks. Although these two teaching methods share similarities in terms of goal orientation, student autonomy, and practicality, they each have their own focus. This article summarizes relevant literature, outlining the theoretical foundations, practical applications, and effects of the two teaching methods. It explores their potential future developments in English education, aiming to provide theoretical guidance and practical reference for English educators and to promote the optimization and innovation of English teaching methods.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Mei DM, Wang Q, 2022, New Developments in English Curriculum for Compulsory Education in the New Era — Interpretation of the English Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education (2022 Edition). Basic Education Curriculum, 2022(10): 19–25.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Piaget J, 1972, The Principles of Genetic Epistemology, translated by W. Mays. Routledge &amp; Kegan Paul, London.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Vygotsky LS, 1978, Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Jonassen D, Marra R, 1993, Whither Constructivism. Libraries Unlimited Inc, Englewood.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen Qi, Liu R, 2007, Contemporary Educational Psychology. Beijing Normal University Press, Beijing, 56.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wu XY, 2006, On the Enlightenment of Constructivist Theory to English Teaching. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 2006(2): 33–35.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>He KK, 2004, On the Educational Ideology and Philosophical Foundation of Constructivism: Reflections on Constructivism. China University Teaching, 2004(7): 15–18 + 23.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang WJ, 2005, Situated Cognition and Learning Theory: Developments of Constructivism. Global Education, 34(4): 56–59 + 33.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Brown JS, 1989, Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1): 32–42.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Nunan D, 1989, Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ellis R, 2003, Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 69–70.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang Q, 2013, English Teaching Methodology. Higher Education Press, Beijing.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Willis JA, 1996, Framework for Task-Based Learning. Longman, London, 45–48.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li JL, 1996, Experimental Research on Situational Teaching. Sichuan Education Press, Sichuan, 50–60.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sui XH, 2012, Research on the Combined Application of Situational Teaching and Task-Driven Teaching in Higher Vocational English Teaching. The Guide of Science &amp; Education, 2012(20): 108–109.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cheng XT, 2014, Analysis and Design of English Textbooks. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang Q, 2016, The Application of Situational Teaching Method in High School English Reading Instruction. Basic Education Foreign Language Teaching Research, 2016(5): 34–39.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wen QF, 2013, The Application of Task-Based Teaching Method in College English Oral Instruction. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2013(4): 54–61.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li JL, 1996, Experimental Research on Situational Teaching. Sichuan Education Press, Sichuan, 50–60.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20" content-type="article"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang Q, 2016, The Application of Situational Teaching Method in High School English Reading Instruction. Basic Education Foreign Language Teaching Research, 2016(5): 34–39.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
