IEFInternational Education Forum3083-49022981-8605Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/ief.v3i9.12250ArticleResearch on the Strategies of College English Teaching Empowered by AI Language Modelshttps://artdesignp.com/journal/IEF/3/9/10.26689/ief.v3i9.12250WangJiaping2025392025-10-16As the digital wave sweeps across the globe, artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping all walks of life at an unprecedented speed, and the field of education is no exception. Against the backdrop of the rapid development of generative AI language models such as ChatGPT, they have significant application value in the fields of language processing, intelligent interaction, and personalized services, which can inject new vitality into the implementation of educational work. As an important course in higher education, College English plays a crucial role in cultivating students’ language communication skills and broadening their horizons. However, there are still a series of problems in current English teaching. In this context, it is necessary for teachers to leverage the technological advantages of AI language models to solve problems, construct a more intelligent teaching model, and further improve the quality and effectiveness of education. Based on this, this paper conducts an in-depth analysis and research on the strategies of College English teaching empowered by AI language models, for reference.

Huang X, Han X, Dou A, 2024, Generative AI in College English Listening Instruction: Exploring Teacher Experiences and Pedagogical Integration. Region Educational Research and Reviews, 6(12): 183–185.

Li J, 2024, Ways to Improve the Model of College English Language Education from the Perspective of New Media. Exploration of Educational Management, 2(12): 16–20.

Wang X, Zhu Y, 2024, The Contribution of Linguistic Distance to L3 Learning Motivation: A Cross-L2 Comparison of University English as a Foreign Language Learners. Education Sciences, 14(12): 1271–1271.

Huang X, Wu Y, Dou A, 2024, AI-Enhanced Task-Based Language Teaching: Fostering Personalized College English Learning. Frontiers in Educational Research, 7(10): 204–209.

Huang X, Dou A, Huang C, 2024, Innovating College English Speaking Instruction through Generative AI: Insights into Pronunciation and Confidence Building. Curriculum and Teaching Methodology, 2024(7): 8.

Zhao YG, 2024, A Study on Chinese Cultural Narration in CET-4 and CET-6 Translation Tests Based on Large Language Models. Shanghai Journal of Translators, 2024(5): 49–54 + 95.

Zhang T, 2024, Reform and Practice of College English Writing Teaching under the Background of Large Language Models. Modern English, 2024(17): 55–57.

Wang YP, 2024, Role Orientation of College English Teachers in Network-Assisted Language Teaching. Overseas English, 2024(16): 136–139.

Wu PH, 2024, Research on TED Talks Assisting College English Listening and Speaking Course Teaching Based on the Concept of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLI). English Square, 2024(21): 105–108.

Huang WW, 2024, A Study on the Correlation between Language Learning Beliefs and English Attrition of College English Learners, thesis, Jilin University. https://doi.org/10.27162/d.cnki.gjlin.2024.006456

Chen YJ, 2024, Application Paths of Large Language Models in College English Writing Teaching. Journal of Qiqihar Junior Teachers’ College, 2024(3): 141–144.

Li H, 2024, Research on the Application of Mobile Language Learning in College English Teaching. Journal of Harbin Vocational & Technical College, 2024(2): 117–119.

Luo CJ, 2024, The Value, Design, and Application of Task-Based Language Teaching Method in College English Teaching. Journal of Ezhou University, 31(2): 41–43.

Ji PY, Fan JS, Fan Y, 2016, College English Curriculum Design and Evaluation Based on Language Curriculum Design Model — A Case Study of English Translation Course. Foreign Languages in China, 13(1): 68–76.

Li Z, 2013, College English Education from the Perspective of Language Economics — An Analysis of a Microeconomic Demand-Supply Model. Journal of Jiangsu Institute of Education (Social Science Edition), 29(5): 99–102 + 141.