<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IEF</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Education Forum</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3083-4902</issn><eissn>2981-8605</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/ief.v4i6.15462</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>An Empirical Study on the Integrated Mathematics Teaching in Junior and Senior High Schools under the 1+3 Training Model — From the Dual Perspectives of Curriculum Reconstruction and Students’ Cognitive Development</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/IEF/4/6/10.26689/ief.v4i6.15462</url><author>JiaLongchun</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>6</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-07-17</published-time></date></history><abstract>In the traditional segmented structure of junior and senior secondary mathematics education, issues such as discontinuity in knowledge systems, cognitive leaps in learning progression, and misalignment of instructional objectives are commonly observed, which hinder the continuous development of students’ mathematical core competencies. Against this background, this study explores an integrated instructional approach based on the “1+3 Talent Development Model” from both curriculum reconstruction and students’ cognitive development perspectives. Focusing on key domains including functions, geometry, and probability and statistics, a vertically integrated framework of mathematics curriculum is constructed, characterized by hierarchical knowledge progression, gradual cognitive development, and continuous competency cultivation. Empirical evidence from teaching practice spanning Grade 9 to Grade 10 demonstrates that the proposed model effectively alleviates knowledge fragmentation and cognitive discontinuity, while significantly enhancing students’ abilities in function understanding, geometric transfer, mathematical modeling, and logical reasoning. The findings suggest that integrated mathematics instruction across junior and senior secondary levels contributes to the systematic optimization of curriculum design and the restructuring of learning pathways, providing both theoretical support and practical implications for curriculum reform in basic education.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, 2020, Mathematics Curriculum Standards for General High Schools (2017 Edition, Revised in 2020). People’s Education Press, Beijing.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Curriculum and Textbook Research Institute of People’s Education Press, 2012, Compulsory Education Textbook • Mathematics (Grades 7 to 9). People’s Education Press, Beijing.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Curriculum and Textbook Research Institute of People’s Education Press, 2019, General High School Textbook • Mathematics (Compulsory Volume 1 to Volume 3). People’s Education Press, Beijing.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li SQ, 2011, Psychology of Mathematics Education (2nd Edition). East China Normal University Press, Shanghai.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bao JS, Zhou C, 2009, The Psychological Foundations and Processes of Mathematics Learning. Shanghai Educational Publishing House, Shanghai.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang SZ, Shi NZ, 2018, Interpretation of the Mathematics Curriculum Standards for General High Schools (2017 Edition). Higher Education Press, Beijing.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang DZ, Song NQ, 2016, Introduction to Mathematics Education (3rd Edition). Higher Education Press, Beijing.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Expert Group on Basic Education Curriculum Reform of the Ministry of Education, 2001, Interpretation of the Outline of Basic Education Curriculum Reform (Trial Implementation). East China Normal University Press, Shanghai.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Liu SX, 2004, Explanatory Notes on the Compilation of the Experimental Textbook for Mathematics Curriculum Standards in General High Schools • Mathematics (Compulsory). Bulletin of Mathematics, 2004(12): 1–3.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen XM, 2000, Qualitative Research Methods and Social Science Research. Educational Science Publishing House, Beijing.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
