<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">IEF</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>International Education Forum</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>3083-4902</issn><eissn>2981-8605</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/ief.v4i7.15816</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Generative AI and Evidentiary Displacement in Second Language Writing: A Critical Integrative Review of Feedback, Composing Processes, and Assessment Validity</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/IEF/4/7/10.26689/ief.v4i7.15816</url><author>WangBin</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>7</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-08-13</published-time></date></history><abstract>Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has become embedded in second language (L2) writing not only as a source of correction, but also as a participant in planning, drafting, translating, revising, evaluating, and genre modeling. This critical integrative review argues that the central pedagogical problem raised by GenAI is evidentiary rather than merely technological. In much classroom and assessment practice, learner texts continue to function as privileged evidence for engagement, authorship, composing decisions, and writing ability. GenAI unsettles this relation because it can produce ideas, structure, language, feedback, and evaluation from minimal input while leaving no reliable trace in the submitted text. This review conceptualizes this problem as evidentiary displacement: evidence of learning is not destroyed, but redistributed across less visible processes of prompting, selecting, evaluating, revising, rejecting, and integrating machine output. Drawing on post-2022 work on GenAI-mediated L2 writing and longer-standing scholarship on feedback engagement, composing processes, and assessment validity, the review examines displacement across three sites: feedback, composing, and assessment. It argues for selective process evidence—revision rationales, decision-point annotations, feedback engagement records, and learners’ accounts of their choices—while also cautioning that documentation can increase workload, reproduce inequities, invite surveillance, and become strategically performed rather than pedagogically meaningful.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Flower L, Hayes JR, 1981, A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4): 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hayes JR, 2012, Modeling and Remodeling Writing. Written Communication, 29(3): 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312451260</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Manchón RM, 2011, Learning-to-Write and Writing-to-Learn in an Additional Language. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Matsuda PK, 2003, Process and Post-Process: A Discursive History. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1): 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00127-3</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Storch N, 2013, Collaborative Writing in L2 Classrooms. Multilingual Matters, Bristol.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ferris DR, 2010, Second Language Writing Research and Written Corrective Feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2): 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990490</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Han Y, Hyland F, 2015, Exploring Learner Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback in a Chinese Tertiary EFL Classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2015(30): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.002</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hyland K, Hyland F, 2006, Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing. Language Teaching, 39(2): 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang ZV, Hyland K, 2018, Student Engagement with Teacher and Automated Feedback on L2 Writing. Assessing Writing, 2018(36): 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, 2014, Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kane MT, 2013, Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1): 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12000</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Messick S, 1989, Validity. in Linn RL (ed.), Educational Measurement, 3rd ed., American Council on Education/Macmillan, 13–103.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Weigle SC, 2002, Assessing Writing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Jiang L, Yu R, Zhao Y, 2024, Theoretical Perspectives and Factors Influencing Machine Translation Use in L2 Writing: A Scoping Review. Journal of Second Language Writing, 64: Article 101099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101099</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lee SM, Kang N, 2024, Effects of Machine Translation on L2 Writing Proficiency: The Complexity, Accuracy, Lexical Diversity, and Fluency. Language Learning &amp; Technology, 28(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73585</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ranalli J, Link S, Chukharev-Hudilainen E, 2017, Automated Writing Evaluation for Formative Assessment of Second Language Writing: Investigating the Accuracy and Usefulness of Feedback as Part of Argument-Based Validation. Educational Psychology, 37(1): 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1136407</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Warschauer M, Tseng W, Yim S, et al., 2023, The Affordances and Contradictions of AI-Generated Text for Writers of English as a Second or Foreign Language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2023(62): Article 101071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pecorari D, 2023, Generative AI: Same Same but Different? Journal of Second Language Writing, 2023(62): Article 101067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101067</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sasaki M, 2023, AI Tools as Affordances and Contradictions for EFL Writers: Emic Perspectives and L1 Use as a Resource. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2023(62): Article 101068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101068</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20" content-type="article"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kubota R, 2023, Another Contradiction in AI-Assisted Second Language Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2023(62): Article 101069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101069</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21" content-type="article"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kang J, Yi Y, 2023, Beyond ChatGPT: Multimodal Generative AI for L2 Writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2023(62): Article 101070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101070</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B22" content-type="article"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Praphan PW, Praphan K, 2023, AI Technologies in the ESL/EFL Writing Classroom: The Villain or the Champion? Journal of Second Language Writing, 2023(62): Article 101072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101072</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B23" content-type="article"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Barrot JS, 2023, Using ChatGPT for Second Language Writing: Pitfalls and Potentials. Assessing Writing, 2023(57): Article 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B24" content-type="article"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Crosthwaite P, Sun S, 2026, Generative AI and L2 Written Feedback Studies: A Scoping Review. RELC Journal, 57(1): 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882251386530</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B25" content-type="article"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Feng H, Li K, Zhang LJ, 2025, What Does AI Bring to Second Language Writing? A Systematic Review (2014-2024). Language Learning &amp; Technology, 29(1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73629</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B26" content-type="article"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li M, 2024, Leveraging ChatGPT for Second Language Writing Feedback and Assessment. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.360382</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B27" content-type="article"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li S, 2025, Generative AI and Second Language Writing. Digital Studies in Language and Literature, 2(1): 122–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/dsll-2025-0007</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B28" content-type="article"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yang C, Li R, Yang L, 2025, Revisiting Trends in GenAI-Assisted Second Language Writing: Retrospect and Prospect. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(7–8): 1819–1863. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331251367309</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B29" content-type="article"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Snyder H, 2019, Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 2019(104): 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B30" content-type="article"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Torraco RJ, 2005, Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3): 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B31" content-type="article"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Whittemore R, Knafl K, 2005, The Integrative Review: Updated Methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5): 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B32" content-type="article"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Boud D, Molloy E, 2013, Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design. Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6): 698–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B33" content-type="article"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Carless D, Boud D, 2018, The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback. Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8): 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B34" content-type="article"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yu S, Zhang ED, Liu C, 2022, Assessing L2 Student Writing Feedback Literacy: A Scale Development and Validation Study. Assessing Writing, 2022(53): Article 100643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100643</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B35" content-type="article"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Allen TJ, Mizumoto A, 2024, ChatGPT over My Friends: Japanese English-as-a-Foreign-Language Learners’ Preferences for Editing and Proofreading Strategies. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882241262533</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B36" content-type="article"><label>36</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lin S, Crosthwaite P, 2024, The Grass Is Not Always Greener: Teacher vs. GPT-Assisted Written Corrective Feedback. System, 2024(127): Article 103529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103529</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B37" content-type="article"><label>37</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yeung S, 2025, University Students’ Engagement with Generative AI-Supported Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) Feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2025(68): Article 101203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101203</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B38" content-type="article"><label>38</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Storch N, 2005, Collaborative Writing: Product, Process, and Students’ Reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3): 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B39" content-type="article"><label>39</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Leijten M, Van Waes L, 2013, Keystroke Logging in Writing Research: Using Inputlog to Analyze and Visualize Writing Processes. Written Communication, 30(3): 358–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313491692</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B40" content-type="article"><label>40</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hwang H, Chang X, Sun J, 2025, Generative AI Is Useful for Second Language Writing, but When, Why, and for How Long Do Learners Use It? Journal of Second Language Writing, 2025(69): Article 101230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101230</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B41" content-type="article"><label>41</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yang W, Lin C, 2025, Translanguaging with Generative AI in EFL Writing: Students’ Practices and Perceptions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2025(67): Article 101181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101181</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B42" content-type="article"><label>42</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Michel M, Bazhutkina I, Abel N, et al., 2025, Collaborative Writing Based on Generative AI Models: Revision and Deliberation Processes in German as a Foreign Language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2025(67): Article 101185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101185</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B43" content-type="article"><label>43</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>de Oliveira LC, dos Santos AE, 2025, Using AI-Text Generated Mentor Texts for Genre-Based Pedagogy in Second Language Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2025(67): Article 101184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101184</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B44" content-type="article"><label>44</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ou AW, Khuder B, Franzetti S, et al., 2024, Conceptualising and Cultivating Critical GAI Literacy in Doctoral Academic Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2024(66): Article 101156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101156</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B45" content-type="article"><label>45</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang C, Wang Z, 2025, Investigating L2 Writers’ Critical AI Literacy in AI-Assisted Writing: An APSE Model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2025(67): Article 101187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101187</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B46" content-type="article"><label>46</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Darvin R, 2025, The Need for Critical Digital Literacies in Generative AI-Mediated L2 Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2025(67): Article 101186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101186</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B47" content-type="article"><label>47</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sandstead M, Kibler A, 2025, Voice in L2 Writing in the Age of AI. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2025(69): Article 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101212</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B48" content-type="article"><label>48</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ng DTK, Leung JKL, Chu SKW, et al., 2021, Conceptualizing AI Literacy: An Exploratory Review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2021(2): Article 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B49" content-type="article"><label>49</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Xu L, Zhang L, Ou L, et al., 2025, The Development and Validation of a Scale on Student AI Literacy in L2 Writing: A Domain-Specific Perspective. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2025(69): Article 101227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101227</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B50" content-type="article"><label>50</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Goulart L, Matte ML, Mendoza A, et al., 2024, AI or Student Writing? Analyzing the Situational and Linguistic Characteristics of Undergraduate Student Writing and AI-Generated Assignments. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2024(66): Article 101160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101160</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B51" content-type="article"><label>51</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Dang A, Wang H, 2024, Ethical Use of Generative AI for Writing Practices: Addressing Linguistically Diverse Students in U.S. Universities’ AI Statements. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2024(66): Article 101157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101157</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B52" content-type="article"><label>52</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Mizumoto A, Shintani N, Sasaki M, et al., 2024, Testing the Viability of ChatGPT as a Companion in L2 Writing Accuracy Assessment. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3(2): Article 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100116</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B53" content-type="article"><label>53</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pfau A, Polio C, Xu Y, 2023, Exploring the Potential of ChatGPT in Assessing L2 Writing Accuracy for Research Purposes. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(3): Article 100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100083</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B54" content-type="article"><label>54</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang C, Tian Z, Christiansen MS, 2025, Toward Critically and Humanely Grounded Futures for L2 Writing in the GenAI Era: Sparking Dialogue and Critical Experimentation. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2025(69): Article 101229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101229</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
