<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JARD</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Architectural Research and Development</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-3529</issn><eissn>2208-3537</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jard.v10i3.15079</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Building Carbon Emission Accounting and Whole Life Cycle Decarbonization Pathways for Green Buildings</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JARD/10/3/10.26689/jard.v10i3.15079</url><author>ZhaoJianwei,XuZheyan</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-06-11</published-time></date></history><abstract>As one of the world’s primary sources of carbon emissions, the building sector’s decarbonization progress directly affects the realization of “dual carbon” goals. Based on life cycle theory, this paper systematically analyzes the technical logic and limitations of carbon emission accounting methods for buildings, and elaborates on innovative pathways for green building decarbonization technologies, including passive design, active energy systems, and BIM-based digitalization. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and a tripartite evolutionary game framework are introduced to analyze the barriers and driving mechanisms for technology diffusion from a socio-technical perspective. Using practical cases from China Construction Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd. (CSCSTC), the paper quantifies emission reduction performance. Finally, a coordinated implementation framework integrating policy regulation, technological innovation, and market incentives is proposed. Results show that combining Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) with the emission factor method can improve accounting accuracy by over 30%; integrating passive design and renewable energy technologies reduces building energy consumption by 50–64%; and scaled application of the “Photovoltaics + Energy storage + Direct current + Flexibility” (PEDF) system achieves renewable energy self-consumption rates above 80%. Furthermore, modular construction reduces carbon emissions from the construction phase by 30%, while green financial instruments such as preferential loans can raise project internal rates of return (IRR) by approximately 2–3 percentage points. This study provides theoretical support and practical guidance for low-carbon transition in the building industry.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>International Energy Agency, 2023, Buildings – Breakthrough Agenda Report 2023. Paris: IEA.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>China Association of Building Energy Efficiency, Chongqing University, 2023, 2023 China Building and Urban Infrastructure Carbon Emissions Research Report. Beijing.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, 2022, “14th Five-Year Plan” for Building Energy Efficiency and Green Building Development. Beijing.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yang B, Chen Z, Zhang X, 2022, The Path to “Carbon Neutrality” in the Construction Industry Under the Dual Carbon Goals. China Economic &amp; Trade Herald, 2022(6): 56–57.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Xu W, Ni J, Sun D, et al., 2021, Research on the Target Decomposition and Path of Building Carbon Peak and Carbon Neutrality in China. Building Science, 37(10): 1–8 + 23.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Shen L, Qu Y, Zhang X, et al., 2022, Research on the Implementation Path of Carbon Neutrality in Shanghai’s Building Sector. Shanghai Construction Science and Technology, 2022(6): 6–12.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
