JARDJournal of Architectural Research and Development2208-35292208-3537Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/jard.v8i3.7157ArticleResearch on the Evaluation System of Community Daycare Center Planning and Implementation from the Perspective of Subject-Object Relationshipshttps://artdesignp.com/journal/JARD/8/3/10.26689/jard.v8i3.7157GuiTijin2024832024-06-17Through literature review, we found that evaluations of urban planning implementation often focus narrowly on either the subject (stakeholders) or the object (projects), while micro-level aspects such as site selection and construction are primarily considered within the context of planning implementation. There is insufficient research on the evaluation of implementation. Community daycare centers play a crucial role in the community home care model, yet there is relatively little research on their usage efficiency, satisfaction levels, and spatial evaluation of planning implementation. Based on the theoretical understanding of the human environment, including the subject, object, and their interactions, an evaluation system for the planning and implementation of community day care centers was constructed, incorporating subjective evaluation, objective evaluation, and comparative analysis.

Central Government of the People’s Republic of China, 2021, Opinions of the State Council of the Central Committee of the People’s Republic of China on Strengthening the Work of the Elderly in the New Era, Bulletin of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China, viewed March 10, 2024, https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-11/24/content_5653181.htm

Wang Y, Li B, Li X, et al., 2016, Type Orientation Problem and Solution Countermeasures in the Operation and Management of Day Care Centers for the Elderly. Journal of Architecture, 2016(S2): 82–86.

Lin W, Tan S, Zhang X, 2015, Research on Behavioral Characteristics and Spatial Needs of the Elderly in Community Daycare Centers. Journal of Architecture, 2015(S1): 192–196.

Sun S, 2015, Evaluation of Master Plan Implementation and its Method Based on Urban Construction Status. Journal of Urban Planning, 2015(03): 9–14.

Sun S, 1999, The Essential Meaning of Planning and its Dilemma. Urban Planning Review, 1999(02): 6–9 + 81.

Sun S, Zhou Y, 2003, Theory and Method of Urban Planning Implementation Evaluation. Urban Planning Review, 2003(02): 15–20 + 27–95.

Yuan Y, 2014, The Main Problems of Master Plan Implementation Evaluation Method and its Thinking. Journal of Urban Planning, 2014(02): 60–66.

Yuan Y, 2013, Evaluation of Community Planning Implementation from the Perspective of Public Space: An Empirical Study Based on Cao Yang New Village in Shanghai. Journal of Urban Planning, 2013(02): 87–94.

Lv M, Wu Z, 2010, Annual Evaluation of Urban Master Plan Implementation--Taking Guangzhou City as an Example. Planner, 26(11): 61–65.

Zhang S, Wang J, Chen D, 2018, Framework and Methods for the Implementation Assessment of Urban Master Plan in the New Era--Taking the Implementation Assessment of Wuhan Urban Master Plan (2010–2020) as an Example. Journal of Urban Planning, 2018(03): 33–39.

Liu Y, Yang X, Sun J, et al., 2022, Exploration of the Implementation Assessment Mechanism of Land Space Special Planning: Taking Suzhou City as an Example. Urban Development Research, 29(03): 31–38.

Shi X, Wang J, Yang M, 2019, Review and New Exploration of the Implementation Assessment Mechanism of Beijing Urban Master Plan. Journal of Urban Planning, 2019(03): 66–73.

Li J, Cai Z, 2013, Implications of foreign urban planning assessment for small town planning and construction implementation assessment. Small town construction, 2013(09): 47–52.

Brody SD, 2003, Implementing the Principles of Ecosystem Management Through Local Land Use Planning. Population and Environment, 24: 511–540.

Berke PR, Crawford J, Dixon J, et al., 1999, Do Cooperative Environmental Planning Mandates Produce Good Plans? Experience. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(5): 643–664.

Baer WC, 1997, General Plan Evaluation Criteria: An Approach to Making Better Plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(3): 329–344.

Wei K, Cai Y, Li S, 2013, The Overall Characteristics of the New York 2030 Plan. A Review of the Overall Characteristics and Implementation Follow-up of the New York 2030 Plan. Planner, 29(01): 89–92.

Chadwick GA, 1978, System View of Planning, Pergamon Press, Oxford,.

Zhou GY, Chen XM, 2022, Introduction to the Royal Town Planning Institute’s “Measuring Linked Elements: Guidelines for the Evaluation of Planning Outcomes”. International Urban Planning, 37(06): 143–149.

Zhao Y, Hua C, 2011, The Economic Assessment System of Housing Planning in the UK and its Reflection. Architectural Journal, 2011(2): 110–113.

Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Henry GT, 2018, Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, Sage Publications.

HM Treasury, Government Finance Function, 2003, The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government, viewed March 10, 2024, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book-appraisal-and-evaluation-in-central-government

CABE, DETR, 2001, The Value of Urban Design, viewed March 10, 2024, https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/fileadmin/uploads/dc/Documents/the-value-of-urban-design_0.pdf

Chen H, Li Q, 2015, A Study on the Performance Evaluation of Community Day Care Centers - City A as a Case Study. Journal of Sichuan Institute of Technology (Social Science Edition), 2015(01): 12–21.

Zhang W, Zhang Y, 2014, Wuhan Community Home-Based Elderly Care Service Station Real State Investigation and Design Thinking. Central China Architecture, 32(01): 69–72.

Shi Y, 2015, Spatial Optimization Model of Community Day Care Center Under the Guidance of Composite Concept. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 47(06): 905–909.

Li B, Wang Y, Li X, Li H, 2015, A study on the Types of Day Care Facilities for the Elderly Based on Multi-Subject Needs Assessment. Journal of Urban Planning, 2015(05): 111–118.

Wei D, Luo P, 2015, Key Points of Public Activity Room Design for Day Care Elderly Facilities Based on the British Model. Urban Architecture, 2015(01): 29–31.

Ke W, Kang J, 2014, Construction Mode and Revelation of Day Care Nursing Facilities in the UK. Journal of Architecture, 2014(05): 77–81.

Chen P, Liu Y, Wang M, 2013, The Development Status and Inspiration of Community Day Care Centers in Foreign Countries and Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan in China. China Nursing Management, 13(11): 67–69.

Hu H, Zhao Y, 2014, Research on Behavioral Systems and Spatial Pattern of Community Day Care Centers for the Elderly. Journal of Architecture, 2014(05): 70–76.

Sun S, 2016, Performance-Based Evaluation of Master Plan Implementation and its Methods. Journal of Urban Planning, 2016(01): 22–27.

Yuan G, 1999, Principles of Marxist Philosophy, Beijing Publishing House, Beijing.

Cong Y, Xia B, Zhang J, 2010, Comprehensive Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Urban-Scale Habitat Environment: Taking Guangzhou as an example. Tropical Geography, 2010(02): 183–187.

Yang C, 2014, Review of Urban Landscape Research in the Field of Subject-Object Relationship. Central China Architecture, 32(02): 22–27.

Dong Q, Guo Y, Ma F, 2012, Difference-Driven Subject-Object Collaborative Comprehensive Evaluation Method. China Management Science, 2012(01): 171–176.

Shen P, Zhang S, 2019, From Single Subject to Multiple Participation: An Analysis of Micro-Renewal Mode of Public Space: Taking Siping Road Street in Shanghai as an Example. Journal of Urban Planning, 2019(03): 103–110.