<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JARD</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Architectural Research and Development</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-3529</issn><eissn>2208-3537</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jard.v8i6.8975</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Optimization Methodology of ESGB on Weights, Evaluation Rating, and Calculation of Carbon Emissions</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JARD/8/6/10.26689/jard.v8i6.8975</url><author>SuJiayi</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>6</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2024-11-28</published-time></date></history><abstract>To cope with climate change, the Chinese government took the lead in advocating the aim of a Carbon peak by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060. In China, the total carbon emission of the whole construction process in 2020 was about 5.08 billion tons of carbon dioxide (CO2), accounting for about 50.90% of the national carbon emission. Consequently, researchers come up with a series of standard assessments for green building optimization measures. Through analysis and comparison of Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), WELL Building Standard (WELL), Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM), and Evaluation Standard for Green Building (ESGB) standards, this study will draw conclusions on optimizing ESGB in terms of weighting, evaluation rating, and carbon emission calculations.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ade R, Rehm M, 2020, The Unwritten History of Green Building Rating Tools: A Personal View from Some of the “Founding Fathers”. Build. Res. Inf., 48(1): 1–17.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Suzer O, 2019, Analyzing the Compliance and Correlation of LEED and BREEAM by Conducting a Criteria-Based Comparative Analysis and Evaluating Dual Certified Projects. Building and Environment, 147: 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.001</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ai YJ, 2016, Comparative Study of British BREEAM and Chinese Green Building Evaluation Standards, thesis, Nanchang University.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ma Y, 2021, Research on Green Building Evaluation System Based on Carbon Emission Analysis of Green Buildings, thesis, Hebei University of Engineering.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li X, Fang W, Liu X, et al, A Comparative Analysis of Green Building Rating Systems in China and the United States. Sustainable Cities and Society, 93: 104520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104520</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang X, Zhan C, Wang X, et al, 2019, Asian Green Building Rating Tools: A Comparative Study on Scoring Methods of Quantitative Evaluation Systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218: 880e895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.192</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pushkar S, 2020, Evaluating LEED Commercial Interior (LEED-CI) Projects Under the LEED Transition from V3 to V4: The Differences Between China and the US. Heliyon, 6(8): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04701</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Park JY, Choi SG, Kim DK, et al, 2017, Credit Optimization Algorithm for Calculating LEED Costs. Sustainability, 9(9): 1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091607</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang Y, Lin S, Li F, 2016, WELL has Analyzed the Differences Between Standard and LEED and Green Building Samsung System. Building Science and Technology, 2016(22): 44–47.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
