<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v10i5.15055</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Dual-Track Complementarity in PhD Education: An Empirical Study of Traditional Mentorship and Online Collaborative Learning</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/10/5/10.26689/jcer.v10i5.15055</url><author>YuMiao,LiJing</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>5</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-06-09</published-time></date></history><abstract>Against the backdrop of globalization and multicultural integration in Southeast Asia, PhD education is transforming from traditional mentorship to online collaborative learning. This study examines four Malaysian universities through surveys of 80 PhD students and 20 supervisors, exploring the application, complementarity, and challenges of both models. Results show online collaborative learning significantly enhances research output and international participation, while traditional mentorship remains irreplaceable for personalized guidance. The hybrid integration of both models is optimal for high-quality PhD education in Southeast Asia’s multicultural context.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kessio DK, 2024, Effective Strategies of Doctorate Students’ Blended Supervision. J Educ Pract, 15(3): 45–58.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Majanga EK, Omachar BS, 2025, Doctoral Supervision Strategies in Developing Countries. Adv Soc Sci Manage, 3(05): 259–268.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Jonassen DH, 2023, Constructivist Learning Environments: Principles and Practices for Doctoral Education. Educational Technology Research &amp; Development, 71(3): 1123–1140.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Becker S, Jacobsen M, Friesen S, 2025, Four Supervisory Mentoring Practices That Support Online Doctoral Students’ Academic Writing. Frontiers in Education, 10: 1521452.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
