<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v10i7.15718</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Organizing Learner Diversity in Mixed-Ability Foreign Language Classrooms: A Critical Review and Framework for Tiered Task Design</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/10/7/10.26689/jcer.v10i7.15718</url><author>WangBin</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-08-04</published-time></date></history><abstract>Learner diversity in foreign language classrooms is often handled as a placement problem. Students are grouped by entrance or proficiency scores, and differentiated instruction is expected to follow from the resulting class structure. This critical integrative review questions that assumption and develops a framework for tiered task design in mixed-ability foreign language classrooms. Drawing on research on ability grouping, tracking, differentiated instruction, second language motivation, task-based language teaching, dynamic assessment, and recent AI-mediated EFL support, the article argues that the central issue is not whether learners differ, but how those differences are identified, interpreted, adjusted for, and made consequential in classroom life. Evidence from general education offers limited support for long-term fixed between-class grouping and points to risks of labeling, reduced teacher expectations, weakened academic self-concept, and unequal access to demanding tasks. Evidence from differentiated instruction and EFL task studies is more favorable to within-class adjustment, although it remains fragmented and does not yet establish tiered task design as a superior intervention. On this basis, the review proposes a four-dimensional account of learner-diversity organization and specifies four mechanisms for tiered task design: shared communicative goals, graded scaffolding, scaffolded choice, and developmental assessment. The framework is presented as a researchable pedagogical model rather than a settled solution, with implications for language programs seeking to support participation and equity without turning proficiency differences into fixed learner labels.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kundu A, Bej T, 2025, Transforming EFL Teaching with AI: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35: 2281–2314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00470-0</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Law L, 2024, Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in Language Teaching and Learning: A Scoping Literature Review. Computers and Education Open, 6: Article 100174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100174</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Slavin RE, 1987, Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Elementary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57(3): 293–336. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057003293</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Slavin RE, 1990, Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60(3): 471–499. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060003471</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Steenbergen-Hu S, Makel MC, Olszewski-Kubilius P, 2016, What One Hundred Years of Research Says About the Effects of Ability Grouping and Acceleration on K–12 Students’ Academic Achievement: Findings of Two Second-Order Meta-Analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4): 849–899. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Terrin É, Triventi M, 2023, The Effect of School Tracking on Student Achievement and Inequality: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 93(2): 236–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221100850</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>OECD, 2023, PISA 2022 Results (Volume II): Learning During—and From—Disruption, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a97db61c-en</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Francis B, Craig N, Hodgen J, et al., 2020, The Impact of Tracking by Attainment on Pupil Self-Confidence Over Time: Demonstrating the Accumulative Impact of Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 41(5): 626–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2020.1763162</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Merton RK, 1948, The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8(2): 193–210. https://doi.org/10.2307/4609267</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rosenthal R, Jacobson L, 1968, Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupils’ Intellectual Development, Holt, Rinehart &amp; Winston.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang S, Rubie-Davies CM, Meissel K, 2018, A Systematic Review of the Teacher Expectation Literature Over the Past 30 Years. Educational Research and Evaluation, 24(3–5): 124–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2018.1548798</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Marsh HW, Hau KT, 2003, Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept: A Cross-Cultural Test of the Negative Effects of Academically Selective Schools. American Psychologist, 58(5): 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.364</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Fang J, Huang X, Zhang M, et al., 2018, The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept: A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 9: Article 1569. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01569</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Roy A, Guay F, Valois P, 2015, The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on Academic Self-Concept: The Moderating Role of Differentiated Instruction and Individual Achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 42: 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.009</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Poehner ME, 2008, Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and Promoting L2 Development, Springer.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Vygotsky LS, 1978, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Tomlinson CA, 2014, The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners, 2nd ed., ASCD, Alexandria, VA.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ellis R, Skehan P, Li S, et al., 2019, Task-Based Language Teaching: Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Robinson P, 2001, Task Complexity, Task Difficulty, and Task Production: Exploring Interactions in a Componential Framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1): 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20" content-type="article"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Skehan P, 1998, A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning, Oxford University Press, Oxford.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21" content-type="article"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bryfonski L, McKay TH, 2019, TBLT Implementation and Evaluation: A Meta-Analysis. Language Teaching Research, 23(5): 603–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817744389</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B22" content-type="article"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Deci EL, Ryan RM, 2000, The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4): 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B23" content-type="article"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ryan RM, Deci EL, 2017, Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness, Guilford Press, New York.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B24" content-type="article"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Howard JL, Bureau J, Guay F, et al., 2021, Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis from Self-Determination Theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6): 1300–1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B25" content-type="article"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Patall EA, Cooper H, Robinson JC, 2008, The Effects of Choice on Intrinsic Motivation and Related Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Research Findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2): 270–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B26" content-type="article"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sisk VF, Burgoyne AP, Sun J, et al., 2018, To What Extent and Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Meta-Analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4): 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617739704</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B27" content-type="article"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wen Q, 2015, Developing a Theoretical System of the Production-Oriented Approach. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 47(4): 547–558.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B28" content-type="article"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wen Q, 2016, Teacher-Student Collaborative Assessment: A New Assessment Form Created by the Production-Oriented Approach. Foreign Language World, 5: 37–43.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B29" content-type="article"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Smale-Jacobse AE, Meijer A, Helms-Lorenz M, et al., 2019, Differentiated Instruction in Secondary Education: A Systematic Review of Research Evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10: Article 2366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B30" content-type="article"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Deunk MI, Smale-Jacobse AE, de Boer H, et al., 2018, Effective Differentiation Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies on the Cognitive Effects of Differentiation Practices in Primary Education. Educational Research Review, 24: 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.002</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B31" content-type="article"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Parsons SA, Vaughn M, Scales RQ, et al., 2018, Teachers’ Instructional Adaptations: A Research Synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 88(2): 205–242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743198</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B32" content-type="article"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pourdana N, Shahpouri Rad M, 2017, Differentiated Instructions: Implementing Tiered Listening Tasks in Mixed-Ability EFL Context. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 4(1): 69–87. https://doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2017.1566</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B33" content-type="article"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rafi F, Pourdana N, 2023, E-Diagnostic Assessment of Collaborative and Individual Oral Tiered Task Performance in Differentiated Second Language Instruction Framework. Language Testing in Asia, 13: Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00223-7</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B34" content-type="article"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sapan M, Mede E, 2022, The Effects of Differentiated Instruction (DI) on Achievement, Motivation, and Autonomy Among English Learners. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 10(1): 127–144. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2022.121125</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B35" content-type="article"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Huang J, Mizumoto A, 2025, The Effects of Generative AI Usage in EFL Classrooms on the L2 Motivational Self System. Education and Information Technologies, 30: 6435–6454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13071-6</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B36" content-type="article"><label>36</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen A, Jia J, Li Y, et al., 2025, Investigating the Effect of Role-Play Activity with GenAI Agent on EFL Students’ Speaking Performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(1): 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241299058</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B37" content-type="article"><label>37</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Guan L, Lee JCK, Zhang Y, et al., 2025, Investigating the Tripartite Interaction Among Teachers, Students, and Generative AI in EFL Education: A Mixed-Methods Study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8: Article 100384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100384</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B38" content-type="article"><label>38</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wu TT, Hapsari IP, Huang YM, 2025, Effects of Incorporating AI Chatbots into Think-Pair-Share Activities on EFL Speaking Anxiety, Language Enjoyment, and Speaking Performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2025.2478271</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B39" content-type="article"><label>39</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lamb M, 2017, The Motivational Dimension of Language Teaching. Language Teaching, 50(3): 301–346. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000088</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B40" content-type="article"><label>40</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Roseth CJ, Johnson DW, Johnson RT, 2008, Promoting Early Adolescents’ Achievement and Peer Relationships: The Effects of Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Goal Structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2): 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
