<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v10i7.15724</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Literature Review on the Impact of Symbol Sense on Algebra Learning in Middle School Students</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/10/7/10.26689/jcer.v10i7.15724</url><author>HaoLele</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-08-05</published-time></date></history><abstract>This paper conducts a literature review to examine domestic and international research on symbolic literacy, defining a four-tiered structure of symbol awareness: perception, operation, reasoning, and representation. It analyzes the differentiated impact of each tier on algebra learning in junior and senior high schools, and constructs a tiered algebra teaching system that integrates secondary education. The study points out that existing research suffers from incomplete coverage of educational stages, a lack of assessment tools, and weak empirical evidence in teaching. It proposes future research directions such as longitudinal tracking, tiered teaching experiments, and digital integration, providing a reference for cultivating symbolic literacy in secondary schools.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Fey JT, 1990, Quantity. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), On the Shoulders of Giants: New Approaches to Numeracy, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 61–94.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Arcavi A, 1994, Symbol Sense: Informal Sense-Making in Formal Mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(3): 24–35.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pierce R, Stacey K, 2004, Monitoring Progress in Algebra in a CAS Active Context: Symbol Sense, Algebraic Insight and Algebraic Expectation. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 11(1): 3–11.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pierce R, Stacey K, 2001, Observations on Students’ Responses to Learning in a CAS Environment. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13(1): 28–46.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kenney R, 2008, The Influence of Symbols on Pre-Calculus Students’ Problem Solving Goals and Activities. PhD diss: North Carolina State University.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Linchevski L, Livneh D, 1999, Structure Sense: The Relationship Between Algebraic and Numerical Contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40, 173–196.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hoch M, Dreyfus T, 2005, Students’ Difficulties with Applying a Familiar Formula in an Unfamiliar Context. In HL Chick &amp; JL Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3), 145–152, PME.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang X, 2007, Symbol Sense in Mathematics Teaching: Understanding under the Meaning of Representational Schemas. Chinese Journal of Educational Studies, (01): 63–65.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Xu W, Yu P, 2007, Number Sense and Its Formation and Development. Journal of Mathematics Education, (02): 8–11.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhou D, Yao X, 2010, What is the Symbol Sense of Primary School Students? People’s Education, (19): 47–48.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Peng Y, 2007, Some thoughts on the “Nine-Year Compulsory Education Mathematics Curriculum Standards.” Mathematics Bulletin, (10): 8–10.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhu L, 2019, Construction of the Analytical Hierarchy of Mathematical Symbol Awareness of Students in Compulsory Education Stage. Journal of Mathematics Education, 28(02): 81–86.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhu L, Ma Y, 2016, Construction of a PORE Evaluation Framework for Students’ Mathematical Symbol Awareness. Journal of Mathematics Education, 25(01): 84–88.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
