<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v5i10.2633</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Problems and Solutions of Teachers’ Evaluation Activities in Colleges and Universities in China</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/5/10/10.26689/jcer.v5i10.2633</url><author>YaoRuru,HaoMingjun</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><issue>10</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2021-10-29</published-time></date></history><abstract>Teacher evaluation is the action guide of teachers, which is extremely important for the development of schools. The establishment of a scientific and effective evaluation for university teachers is the key step in adapting to the current “double first-class” background in the construction of high-level teachers. Based on Habermas’ theory of communicative action, this study analyzes the shortcomings and the reasons behind the current evaluation activities of university teachers in China as well as explores the standardization of these evaluation activities to meet the needs of the connotative development of higher education.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zou XT, 2010, A Review of College Teachers’ Evaluation from the Perspective of Intersubjectivity. Educational Review, (6): 49.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li WP, Shen H, 2016, What University Teachers Care Most About – Analysis Based on the “2014 Survey of Chinese University Teachers”. China Higher Education Research, (1): 99.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Feng JL, 2016, The Dilemma and Outlet of University Academic Ecology. University Education Science, (6): 101-106.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cao TS, 2019, “Five Dimensions” Problems: Evaluation of Teachers in Colleges and Universities: Consequences, Root Causes and Solutions. University Education Science, (1): 30.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chu JX, 2013, Towards School-based Management: Dilemma and Transcendence of Departmental Management in Higher Vocational Colleges. (17): 61.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
