<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v5i11.2754</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Trend Analysis of the Research on Construction Grammar in CSSCI Journals from 2010 to 2020</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/5/11/10.26689/jcer.v5i11.2754</url><author>LunXinyu</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><issue>11</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2021-11-30</published-time></date></history><abstract>This study aims at analyzing the tendency and change in the research on construction grammar from 2010 to 2020. Descriptively, this study includes the publication year, research topic, research direction, research content, and the research methods. Twenty-four CSSCI journals were selected as the research samples using the keyword – “Construction Grammar.” The research topics mainly include Chinese construction research, foreign language construction research, and comparative studies on Chinese and other language constructions. The results showed that there are many Chinese construction research, but the other two research topics still require improvement. Ontology research was the main focus; acquisition research and teaching research are worthy for further exploration. Case studies and theoretical studies were the most concerned contents, whereas studies on language acquisition, pedagogy, and corpus construction were feeble. Qualitative description and theoretical review were the most popular methods, while empirical, quantitative, and diachronic analyses were less frequently used. After analyzing the trends, it has been predicted that the research on construction grammar would continue to heat up in the future, and there would be more research directions and contents along with diversified research methods.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wen X, Si W, 2021, 20 Years of Constructional Grammar Research in China: Retrospect and Prospect. Journal of PLA Foreign Languages Institute, (05): 43-51, 160-161.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Shi C, 2021, Three Views of Construction: The Basic Ideas of Construction Grammar. Journal of Northeast Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (04): 1-15.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Jin S, Lin Z, 2017, Atlas Analysis of International Metonymy Research Trends (2007-2016). Foreign Language Study, (03): 18-23.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Fan Z, Guo Y, 2018, Development Trend and Frontier Dynamics of Foreign Constructional Grammar research – Analysis of Scientific knowledge Map Based on Visualization Technology. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing (Social Science Edition), (06): 56-63.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wu X, 2019, Visual Analysis of Domestic Construction Grammar Research Based on CiteSpace 5.0. Journal of Dongguan Institute of Technology, (6): 91-97.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhu J, Cui X, 2012, A Review of the Theory and Application of Constructive Grammar. Modern Languages (Language Studies Edition), (10): 7-12.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang J, 2012, The Domestic Structure Theory Research Review of Grammar. Journal of Suzhou Institute of Education, (06): 53-57.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
