JCERJournal of Contemporary Educational Research2208-84662208-8474Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/jcer.v6i3.3574ArticleAn Assessment Scale for Evaluating the Experimental Design Ability of Elementary Science Teachers Based on Primary Trait Analysishttps://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/6/3/10.26689/jcer.v6i3.3574TianSaiqi,ZhuJinxing,ChenChuyin,WangZhiqing2022632022-03-15In this study, an assessment scale for evaluating the experimental design ability of elementary science teachers was constructed based on primary trait analysis. This assessment scale contains three first-level indexes and eleven second-level indexes. The corresponding weights of indexes were determined by the objective weighting method. The scores of all the descriptions of the indexes were also assigned. After a trial test, this assessment scale was verified to be reliable and valid for evaluating the experimental design ability of elementary science teachers.

Rudolph JL, 2020, The Lost Moral Purpose of Science Education. Science Education, 104: 895-906.

Yilmaz RM, 2020, Effects of Using Cueing in Instructional Animations on Learning and Cognitive Load Level of Elementary Students in Science Education. Interactive Learning Environments, 2020: 1-15.

Kaya E, 2018, Argumentation in Elementary Science Education: Addressing Methodological Issues and Conceptual Understanding. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13: 1087-1090.

Ha S, Kim M, 2020, Challenges of Designing and Carrying Out Laboratory Experiments About Newton’s Second Law. Science & Education, 29: 1389-1416.

Burron G, Pegg J, 2021, Elementary Pre-Service Teachers’ Search, Evaluation, and Selection of Online Science Education Resources. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30: 471-483.

Cruz-Guzman M, Garcia-Carmona A, Criado AM, 2020, Proposing Questions for Scientific Inquiry and the Selection of Science Content in Initial Elementary Education Teacher Training. Research in Science Education, 50: 1689-1711.

Cruz-Guzman M, Garcia-Carmona A, Criado AM, 2017, An Analysis of the Questions Proposed by Elementary Pre-Service Teachers when Designing Experimental Activities as Inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 39: 1755-1774.

Zimmerman C, Glaser R, 2003, A Follow-up Investigation on the Role of Cover Story on the Assessment of Experimental Design Skills, Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, 19.

Walvoord BE, Anderson VJ, 1998, Effective Grading: A Tool for Learning and Assessment, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.

Walvoord BE, Bardy B, Denton J, 2007, Closing the Feedback Loop in Classroom-Based Assessment, Assessing Student Achievement in General Education, 64-70.

Farmer DW, 1993, Course?Embedded Assessment: A Teaching Strategy to Improve Student Learning. Assessment Update, 5(1): 8-11.

Baughin JA, Brod EF, Page DL, 2002, Primary Trait Analysis: A Tool for Classroom-Based Assessment. College Teaching, 50(2): 75-80.

Liu D, Wang L, 2012, Elements of Scientific Inquiry Ability Based on Analysis of Foreign Science Curriculum Documents. Chemistry Education, 33(9): 44-49.

Cao Y, 2014, Status Quo Test and Analysis of High School Students’ Physical Experimentation Ability, Henan Normal University.

Guo J, Wu X, Tang Y, 2005, Evaluation Implementation Procedure of Chemical Experimental Ability in Middle School. Modern Primary and Secondary Education, 2005(11): 65-68.

Tian C, Qin Q, 2018, Using PTA Scale to Assess Students’ Physics Experimental Design Ability. Journal of Physics Teaching, 2018(10): 64-66.

Ministry of Education, 2017, Primary Science Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education, Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China.

Ministry of Education, 2011, Biology Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education, Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China.

Taber KS, 2018, The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha when Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48: 1273-1296.