JCERJournal of Contemporary Educational Research2208-84662208-8474Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/jcer.v6i7.4176ArticleThe Course Reform of Mechanical Design Fundamentals to Cultivate Engineering Literacy and Innovation Abilityhttps://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/6/7/10.26689/jcer.v6i7.4176LiangKeshan,ShangJianzhong,LuoZirong2022672022-07-27In view of the shortcomings of traditional teaching in the Mechanical Design Fundamentals course, the teaching resources are integrated, the teaching content, teaching methods, and assessment methods are reformed, scientific research results are introduced into course teaching, and the task-driven teaching practice is applied. These measures have improved classroom activity, stimulated independent learning, and laid the foundation for the cultivation of students’ engineering literacy and innovative ability.

Yao L, Ye Z, 2001, Discussion on Teaching Reform of Basic Courses of Mechanical Design. Journal Of Fuzhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2001(54): 143–145.

Hou Y, Kong J, Yang J, et al., 2011, Research on Diversified Practice Teaching System of Mechanical Principle. China Metallurgical Education, 2011(2): 33–36.

Yan S, Sheng Y, Ji H, et al., 2004, The New Teaching Mode of the Series Courses of Mechanical Design Fundamentals. China University Teaching, 2004(6): 28–29.

Peng S, Yang P, 2021, Research of Multi-Dimensional Teaching Resource Construction of Engineering Mathematics Under the Mixed Teaching Mode in Military Academy. Journal of Science of Teachers’ College and University, 41(7): 70–74.

Kong J, Hou Y, Gao Q, et al., 2012, Practical Teaching Reform of Mechanical Majors with Emphasis on Knowledge Integration and Ability Training. China University Teaching, 2012(6): 70–73.

Xu L, Cheng J, Zhu J, 2009, Teaching Reform in Machine Design Fundamental Course by Using the Problem-based Learning Methods. Higher Education in Chemical Engineering, 2009(6): 72–73.

Liu C, 2022, The Exploration and Practice of Process Evaluation in the Reform of Assessment Methods of Higher Mathematics Courses. Higher Education Research of Cambridge University, 8(1): 5–7.