<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v6i9.4297</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>A Case Study of Vietnam War from the Perspective of Individual Power in History: Analysis of Leaders Make Events</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/6/9/10.26689/jcer.v6i9.4297</url><author>ZhangYiyin</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>9</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2022-09-28</published-time></date></history><abstract>The question of whether leaders make events or events make leaders in history seemed to never come to a concrete answer. The reflexivity of this question highlights that perspectives matter, thus a definite conclusion that meet the expectation of all historical research cannot be made. The Vietnam War was one of the critical historical events in American history, and it has largely altered the future of USA at an international level in terms of foreign policies and also at a domestic level since it influenced the US presidency by setting up a commitment trap [1]. The relationship between leaders and events in the history will be discussed in this essay by talking about the succession of presidency in USA [1] during the Vietnam War. Moreover, making an attempt to show the possibility of leaders can portrait future development of events based on their unique personalities and thinking.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sagan SD, 2000, The Commitment Trap: Why the United States Should Not Use Nuclear Threats to Deter Biological and Chemical Weapons Attacks. International Security, 24(4): 85–115.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rogowski J, 2019, The American Presidency, Harvard University, Knafel.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kagan E, 2001, Presidential Administration. Harvard Law Review, 114(8): 2245–2385.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Howell WG, 2017, An American Presidency: Institutional Foundations of Executive Politics, Pearson Education, London.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sacharoff L, 2009, Former Presidents and Executive Privilege. Texas Law Review, 88(2): 302–351.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Milkis SM, Nelson M, 2016, The American Presidency: Origins and Development, 1776–2014, CQ Press, Washington, D.C.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Anneflore D, 2014, Vietnam War: US Involvement in Vietnam (1965-1975), 121</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rauch J, 2016, “How American Politics Went Insane”, The Atlantic, viewed August 2022, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/07/how-american-politics-went-insane/485570/</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Arbore CB, 2009, An Overview on the US Involvement in the Vietnam War, Humanity and Political Science, 21–25.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ma L, 2008, The Vietnam War, Oxford University Press, Oxford.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cameron C, 2009, The Presidential Veto, in Oxford Handbook of the Presidency, Oxford University Press, Oxford.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kennedy JB, 2015, “Do This! Do That! and Nothing Will Happen:’ Executive Orders and Bureaucratic Responsiveness”. American Politics Research, 43(1): 59–82</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Howell WG, Moe TM, 2016, Relic: How Our Constitution Undermines Effective Governance– And Why We Need a More Powerful Presidency, Basic Books, New York.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Anders, 2016, The Cold War-The Americans, Hodder Education, 76.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kernell, 2006, Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership, CQ Press, Washington D.C.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Canes-Wrone B, Howell WG, Lewis DE, 2008, Toward a Broader Understanding of Presidential Power: A Reevaluation of the Two Presidencies Thesis. Journal of Politics, 70(1): 1–16</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Mamaux A, 2015, The Cold War: Superpower Tensions and Rivalries, Oxford University Press, Oxiford, 188.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cameron C, 2002, Studying the Polarized Presidency. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 32(4): 647–663.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
