JCERJournal of Contemporary Educational Research2208-84662208-8474Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/jcer.v7i12.5761ArticleA Study on Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition Under the Categorization Theoryhttps://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/7/12/10.26689/jcer.v7i12.5761XiaoTing20237122023-12-25In cognitive linguistics, debates on the status and functions of categorization have been a heated issue. In semantics and second language acquisition, scholars have discussed and achieved vocabulary acquisition from different perspectives and academic levels. Vocabulary learning exerts a fundamental role in second language vocabulary acquisition (SLVA), and it is closely related to learners’ cognitive competence. However, studies on second language vocabulary acquisition under the categorization theory in cognitive linguistics have received less attention from linguists when compared with other studies. This paper employs two representative dimensions, the basic-level effect and the prototype effect, under the categorization theory to further delve into the implications on second language vocabulary acquisition. This article first provides a comprehensive introduction to the nature and the approaches of the categorization theory, and then analyzes the relations and implications for second language vocabulary acquisition under the categorization theory from the perspective of the basic-level and the prototype effects. The research results showed that the basic-level effect on SLVA is mainly on the classification of word categories distinguished from the superordinate and subordinate categories, while the prototype effect is more on understanding the complexity and use of word meaning.

Hopp H, Putnam MT, Vosburg N, 2019, Derivational Complexity vs. Transfer Effects. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 9(3): 341–375.

Ausubel DP, 1964, Adults Versus Children in Second?Language Learning: Psychological Considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 48(7): 420–424.

Barr RA, Caplan LJ, 1987, Category Representations and Their Implications for Category Structure. Memory & Cognition, 15(5): 397–418.

Boers F, De Knop S, De Rycker A, (eds) 2010, Fostering Language Teaching Efficiency Through Cognitive Linguistics, Fostering Language Teaching Efficiency Through Cognitive Linguistics, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin.

Comesa AM, Perea M, Piero A, et al., 2009, Vocabulary Teaching Strategies and Conceptual Representations of Words in L2 in Children: Evidence with Novice Learners. Exp Child Psychol, 104(1): 22–33.

Ungerer F, Schmid HJ, Chen Z, et al., 2001, An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics, Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Ross WA, Robar E, (eds) 2023, Linguistic Theory and the Biblical Text. Cambridge Semitic Languages and Cultures, 2023(20). https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0358

Tay D, Pan MX, (eds) 2022, Data Analytics in Cognitive Linguistics: Methods and Insights, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110687279

Tyler A, Huang L, Jan H, (eds) 2018, What is Applied Cognitive Linguistics. Answers from Current SLA Research, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110572186

Escabillas V, Ilustre RG, 2022, Motivation Level of Filipino Young Learners in L2 Learning on Online Distance Learning: Language Acquisition: Level of Motivation, Online Distance Learning, Second Language, Research. Journal of World Englishers and Educational Practices, 4(1): 10–14.