<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v8i11.8831</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Exploration of the Impact of Language Proficiency on Vocabulary Association Patterns in English Language Education</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/8/11/10.26689/jcer.v8i11.8831</url><author>JinYuxin</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>11</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2024-11-27</published-time></date></history><abstract>This paper explores the lexical association patterns of English as a second language and their relationship with language proficiency. Through the vocabulary association test, the study analyzes the differences in vocabulary association between learners with different language levels. The participants were 100 non-native English-speaking undergraduate students from a top 200 university, such as the University of Nottingham, and a university outside the top 200, such as the University of Aberdeen; the two groups of learners differed in their vocabulary size and learning style. It was found that the two groups of learners differed significantly in vocabulary size, language background, and learning experience. In addition, the study raises three core questions: first, learners’ lexical association patterns, second, differences in association among learners with different language proficiency levels, and third, other variables that affect vocabulary association ability. The limitations of the study are that reaction time was not measured and the influence of native language background on word association was not fully considered; future research should further explore these aspects.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Postman L, Keppel G, 2014, Norms of Word Association, Academic Press, Cambridge.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wolter B, 2001, Comparing the L1 and L2 Mental Lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(1): 41–69.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Deyne S, Storms G, 2008, Word Associations: Network and Semantic Properties. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1): 213–231.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Schmitt N, McCarthy M, 1997, Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Meara PM, 2009, Connected Words: Word Associations and Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition, John Benjamins Pub. Co, Amsterdam, 27.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Piaget J, 1923, The language and thought of the child, Delachaux and Niestlé, France.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Fitzpatrick T, 2012, Tracking the Changes: Vocabulary Acquisition in the Study Abroad Context. Language Learning Journal, 40(1): 81–98.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Fitzpatrick T, 2006, Habits and Rabbits: Word Associations and the L2 Lexicon. Eurosla Yearbook, (6): 121–145.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Meara P, 1996, The Vocabulary Knowledge Framework. Vocabulary Acquisition Research Group Virtual Library, 5(2): 1–11.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Schmitt N, Schmitt D, Clapham C, 2001, Developing and Exploring the Behavior of Two New Versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18(1): 55–88.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
