JCERJournal of Contemporary Educational Research2208-84662208-8474Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/jcer.v8i12.7662ArticleA Study on Literacy Enhancement: Assessing the Impact of Technology-Assisted Reading Instruction on English Language Learnershttps://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/8/12/10.26689/jcer.v8i12.7662LiuGuizhen,AgojoHanna Pauline C.,CabralDona M.20248122024-12-31The purpose of this research is to assess the impact of technology-assisted reading instruction specifically on English language learners. The interview method was employed and the questionnaire served as the major data-gathering instrument. The respondents of the study were composed of learners. It was evident from the results that technology-assisted reading instruction provided significant benefits for improving reading comprehension through individualized and interesting learning experiences. In addition to promoting more engagement, this method enhances literacy, allowing students to engage in more meaningful conversations in English. Overall, technology-assisted reading instruction has been shown to help English language learners become more motivated and engaged by providing them with individualized, interactive learning opportunities that effectively accelerate their language development.

August D, Shanahan T, 2006, Developing Literacy in Second-Language Learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, US.

Grabe WP, Stoller FL, 2011, Teaching and Researching Reading (2nd edition), Routledge, London.

Jiménez RT, García GE, Pearson PD, 1996, The Reading Strategies of Bilingual Latina/o Students Who Are Successful English Readers: Opportunities and Obstacles. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(1): 90–112

Warschauer M, Healey D, 1998, Computer and Language Learning: An Overview. Language Teaching, 31(2): 57–71.

Chen CM, Chung CJ, 2008, Personalize Mobile English Vocabulary Language Learning System Based on Item Response Theory and Learning Memory Cycle. Computers and Education, 51(2): 624–645.

Golonka EM, Bowles AR, Frank VM, et al., 2014, Technologies for Foreign Language Learning: A Review of Technology Types and Their Effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1): 70–105.

Liu TC, Lin YC, Paas F, 2010, Effects of Cues and Real Objects on Learning in a Mobile Device Supported Environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3): 383–399.

Huang HM, Liaw SS, 2015, An Analysis of Learners’ Intention Towards Virtual Reality Learning Based on Constructivist and Technology Acceptance Approaches. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1): 91–115.

Lin CJ, Hwang GJ, 2019, A Learning Analytics Approach to Investigating Factors Affecting EFL Students’ Oral Performance in a Flipped Classroom. Educational Technology and Society, 22(1): 205–219.

Mikulecky B, 2011, A Short Course in Teaching Reading (2nd edition), Pearson Education, London.

Grabe W, Yamashita J, 2022, Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice (2nd edition), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Jang E, Seo YS, Brutt-Griffler J, 2022, Building Academic Resilience in Literacy: Digital Reading Practices and Motivational and Cognitive Engagement. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(1): 160–176.

Blachowicz CLZ, Beyersdorfer J, Fisher P, 2006, Vocabulary Development and Technology: Teaching and Transformation, in McKenna MC, Labbo LD, Kieffer R, Reinking D, (eds.), International Handbook of Literacy and Technology (Volume 2), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 341–348.

Chard DJ, Vough S, Tyler BJ, 2002, A Synthesis of Research on Effective Interventions for Building Reading Fluency with Elementary Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(5): 386–406.

Bentley J, 2014, Report from TESOL 2014: 1.5 Billion English Learners Worldwide, viewed April 5, 2024, https://www.internationalteflacademy.com/blog/report-from-tesol-2-billion-english-learners-worldwide

Lake VE, Beisly AH, 2019, Translation Apps: Increasing Communication with Dual Language Learners. Early Childhood Education Journal, (47): 489–496.

Prior A, Goldina A, Shany M, et al., 2014, Lexical Inference in L2: Predictive Roles of Vocabulary Knowledge and Reading Skill Beyond Reading Comprehension. Reading and Writing, (27): 1467–1484.

Chun DM, 2016, The Role of Technology in SLA Research. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2): 98–115.

Lan YJ, Sung YT, Chang KE, 2009, Let Us Read Together: Development and Evaluation of a Computer-Assisted Reciprocal Early English Reading System. Computers & Education, 53(4): 1188–1198.

Hwang WY, Chen HSL, Shadiev R, et al., 2014, Improving English as a Foreign Language Writing in Elementary Schools with Mobile Devices. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(5): 101–125.

Mirzei A, Domakani MR, Rahimi S, 2016, Computerized Lexis-Based Instruction in EFL Classrooms: Using Multi-Purpose LexisBOARD to Teach L2 Vocabulary. ReCALL, 28(1): 22–43.

Tsou W, Wang W, Li H, 2002, How Computers Facilitate English Foreign Language Acquire English Abstract Words. Computers & Education, 39(4): 345–357.

Prensky M, 2001, Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5): 1–6.

Nasah A, DaCosta B, Kinsell C, et al., 2010, The Digital Literacy Debate: An Investigation of Digital Propensity and Information and Communication Technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, (58): 531–555.

Palfrey J, Gasser U, 2008, Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives, Basic Books, New York.

Bennet S, Maton KA, Kervin L, 2008, The ‘Digital Natives’ Debate: A Critical Review of the Evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5): 775–786.

Kennedy GE, Judd TS, Churchward A, et al., 2008, First Year Students’ Experiences with Technology: Are They Really Digital Natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1): 108–122.

Guzey SS, Roehrig GH, 2012, Integrating Educational Technology into the Secondary Science Teaching. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, (12): 162–183.

Egbert JL, Petrie GM, 2006, CALL Research Perspectives, Routledge, London.

Maynard S, 2010, The Impact of E-Books on Young Children’s Reading Habits. Publishing Research Quarterly, 26(4): 236–248.

Ghalebandi SG, Noorhidawati A, 2019, Engaging Children with Pleasure Reading: The E-Reading Experience. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(8): 1213–1237.

Have I, Pederson BS, 2013, Sonic Mediatization of the Book: Affordances of the Audiobook. Journal of the Media and Communication Research, 29(54): 123–140.

Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH, 2004, School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1): 59–109.

Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, et al., 2013, Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies, U.S. Department of Education, US.

Pane JF, Steiner ED, Baird MD, et al., 2017, Continued Progress: Promising Evidence on Personalized Learning, RAND Corporation, US.

Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, et al., 2011, From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining “Gamification,” Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, ACM, 9–15.

Skinner EA, Belmont MJ, 1993, Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement Across the School Year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4): 571–581.

Gay G, 2010, Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice (2nd edition), Teachers College Press, New York.

Hidi S, Renninger KA, 2006, The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2): 111–127.