<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v8i5.6666</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Effects of Perceived Teacher Support on Student Behavioral Engagement in the Blended Learning Environment: Learning Experience as a Mediator</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/8/5/10.26689/jcer.v8i5.6666</url><author>ZhangYanle,ChenPeipei,JiangSuo,GaoJunjian</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2024-06-12</published-time></date></history><abstract>Blended learning (BL) has been widely adopted to improve students’ academic achievements in higher education. However, its success relies mainly on student engagement, which plays an essential role in active learning and provides a rich understanding of students’ experiences.&amp;nbsp;The study utilized three self-designed scales—the Teacher Support Scale, Student Engagement Scale, and Student Learning Experience Scale—to gauge and examine the impact and relationship between perceived teacher support, student behavioral engagement, and the intermediary role of learning experiences. A cohort of 899 college students undertaking the obligatory College English course through BL modes across five Chinese universities actively participated by completing a comprehensive questionnaire. The results showed significant correlations between perceived teacher support, learning experience, and behavioral engagement. Perceived teacher support significantly predicted students’ behavioral engagement, with socio-affective support exerting the most substantial predictive effects. All predictive effects were partially mediated by learning experience (learning mode, online resources, overall LMS-based learning, interaction with their instructor and peers, and learning outcome). The influence of perceived teacher support on behavioral engagement differed between students who reported the most positive (vs. negative) learning experiences. Suggestions for further research are offered for consideration.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bruggeman B, Tondeur J, Struyven K, et al., 2021, Experts Speaking: Crucial Teacher Attributes for Implementing Blended Learning in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, (48): 100772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100772</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kaleta R, Skibba K, Joosten T, 2007, Discovering, Designing, and Delivering Hybrid Courses, in Picciano AG, Dzuiban C, (eds.), Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, The Sloan Consortium, Needham, MA.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Garrison DR, Kanuka H, 2004, Blended Learning: Uncovering Its Transformative Potential in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2): 95–105.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Salhab R, Daher W, 2023, University Students’ Engagement in Mobile Learning. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(1): 202–216.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Halverson LR, Graham CR, 2019, Learner Engagement in Blended Learning Environments: A Conceptual Framework. Online Learning, 23(2): 145–178. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Manwaring KC, Larsen R, Graham CR, et al., 2017, Investigating Student Engagement in Blended Learning Settings Using Experience Sampling and Structural Equation Modeling. Internet and Higher Education, (35): 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.06.002</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cents-Boonstra M, Lichtwarck-Aschoff A, Lara MM, et al., 2022, Patterns of Motivating Teaching Behaviour and Student Engagement: A Microanalytic Approach. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 37(1): 227–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00543-3</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Henry KL, Knight KE, Thornberry TP, 2012, School Disengagement as a Predictor of Dropout, Delinquency, and Problem Substance Use During Adolescence and Early Adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, (41): 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9665-3</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhou J, 2010, Impact of Engagement on the Academic Performance and Persistence of First-Year College Students at a Four-Year Public Institution, dissertation, The Florida State University.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang MT, Fredricks JA, 2014, The Reciprocal Links Between School Engagement, Youth Problem Behaviors, and School Dropout During Adolescence. Child Development, 85(2): 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12138</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kuh GD, 2009, The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and Empirical Foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141): 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kuh GD, 2009, What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know About Student Engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6): 683–706.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Gershenson S, 2016, Linking Teacher Quality, Student Attendance, and Student Achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 11(2): 125–149.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Werang B, Radja Leba SM, 2022, Factors Affecting Student Engagement in Online Teaching and Learning: A Qualitative Case Study. The Qualitative Report, 27(2): 555–577. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5165</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Doo MY, Bonk CJ, Heo H, 2023, Examinations of the Relationships Between Self-Efficacy, Self-Regulation, Teaching, Cognitive Presences, and Learning Engagement During COVID-19. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2): 481–504.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yanbo W, Bazari NA, Anuar R, 2023, Theoretical Construction and Research Perspectives of Student Engagement in Foreign Language Education. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(1): 133–146.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hsu TC, Chang C, Jen TH, 2023, Artificial Intelligence Image Recognition Using Self-Regulation Learning Strategies: Effects on Vocabulary Acquisition, Learning Anxiety, and Learning Behaviours of English Language Learners. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2165508</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li J, Xue E, 2023, Dynamic Interaction Between Student Learning Behaviour and Learning Environment: Meta-Analysis of Student Engagement and Its Influencing Factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1): 59.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rasheed MI, Malik MJ, Pitafi AH, et al., 2020, Usage of Social Media, Student Engagement, and Creativity: The Role of Knowledge Sharing Behavior and Cyberbullying. Computers &amp; Education, (159): 104002.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20" content-type="article"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pellas N, 2014, The Influence of Computer Self-Efficacy, Metacognitive Self-Regulation and Self-Esteem on Student Engagement in Online Learning Programs: Evidence from the Virtual World of Second Life. Computers in Human Behavior, (35): 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.048</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21" content-type="article"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen CH, Wu IC, 2012, The Interplay Between Cognitive and Motivational Variables in a Supportive Online Learning System for Secondary Physical Education. Computers &amp; Education, 58(1): 542–550.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B22" content-type="article"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Guo J, 2018, Building Bridges to Student Learning: Perceptions of the Learning Environment, Engagement, and Learning Outcomes Among Chinese Undergraduates. Studies in Educational Evaluation, (59): 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.08.002</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B23" content-type="article"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cho MH, Castaneda DA, 2019, Motivational and Affective Engagement in Learning Spanish with a Mobile Application. System, (81): 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.008</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B24" content-type="article"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lietaert S, Roorda D, Laevers F, et al., 2015, The Gender Gap in Student Engagement: The Role of Teachers’ Autonomy Support, Structure, and Involvement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4): 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12095</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B25" content-type="article"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Tang CW, Jun Shi M, de Guzman AB, 2022, Lecturer Teaching Styles and Student Learning Involvement in Large Classes: A Taiwan Case Study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(3): 447–463.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B26" content-type="article"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Xu W, Stahl G, 2023, Teaching Chinese with Chinese Characteristics: ‘Difficult’ Knowledge, Discomforting Pedagogies and Student Engagement. Pedagogy, Culture &amp; Society, 31(1): 57–73.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B27" content-type="article"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Tao Y, Meng Y, Gao Z, et al., 2022. Perceived Teacher Support, Student Engagement, and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology, 42(4): 401–420.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B28" content-type="article"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Roorda DL, Koomen HM, Spilt JL, et al., 2011, The Influence of Affective Teacher–Student Relationships on Students’ School Engagement and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4): 493–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B29" content-type="article"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang MT, Eccles JS, 2013, School Context, Achievement Motivation, and Academic Engagement: A Longitudinal Study of School Engagement Using a Multidimensional Perspective. Learning and Instruction, (28): 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B30" content-type="article"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rajesh JI, Pare V, Rasel S, et al., 2023, Gamification: Teacher Proactive Support and Student Engagement During Covid-19 and Beyond, in Sultan P, (ed.), Innovation, Leadership and Governance in Higher Education, Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7299-7_5</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B31" content-type="article"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Skinner EA, Pitzer JR, 2012, Developmental Dynamics of Student Engagement, Coping, and Everyday Resilience, in Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C, (eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, Springer, US, 21–44. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B32" content-type="article"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Strati AD, Schmidt JA, Maier KS, 2017, Perceived Challenge, Teacher Support, and Teacher Obstruction as Predictors of Student Engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1): 131–147.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B33" content-type="article"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sadoughi M, Hejazi SY, 2022, The Effect of Teacher Support on Academic Engagement: The Serial Mediation of Learning Experience and Motivated Learning Behavior. Current Psychology, (42): 18858–18869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03045-7</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B34" content-type="article"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zeinstra L, Kupers E, Loopers J, et al., 2023, Real-Time Teacher-Student Interactions: The Dynamic Interplay Between Need Supportive Teaching and Student Engagement Over the Course of One School Year. Teaching and Teacher Education, (121): 103906.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B35" content-type="article"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Roorda DL, Jak S, Zee M, et al., 2017, Affective Teacher–Student Relationships and Students’ Engagement and Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Update and Test of the Mediating Role of Engagement. School Psychology Review, 46(3): 239–261. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0035.V46-3</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B36" content-type="article"><label>36</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lei H, Cui Y, Zhou W, 2018, Relationships Between Student Engagement and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3): 517–528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B37" content-type="article"><label>37</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Henry A, Thorsen C, 2021, Teachers’ Self-Disclosures and Influences on Students’ Motivation: A Relational Perspective. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1441261</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B38" content-type="article"><label>38</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Alexander B, Ashford-Rowe K, Barajas-Murphy N, et al., 2019, EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: 2019 Higher Education Edition, Educause, Louisville, CO, USA.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B39" content-type="article"><label>39</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Veluvali P, Surisetti J, 2022, Learning Management System for Greater Learner Engagement in Higher Education—A Review. Higher Education for the Future, 9(1): 107–121.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B40" content-type="article"><label>40</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Huang J, Matthews KE, Lodge JM, 2022, ‘The University Doesn’t Care About the Impact It Is Having on Us’: Academic Experiences of the Institutionalisation of Blended Learning. Higher Education Research &amp; Development, 41(5): 1557–1571.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B41" content-type="article"><label>41</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Batista-Toledo S, Gavilan D, 2023, Student Experience, Satisfaction and Commitment in Blended Learning: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Mathematics, 11(3): 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11030749</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B42" content-type="article"><label>42</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hung HT, 2017, Design-Based Research: Redesign of an English Language Course Using a Flipped Classroom Approach. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1): 180–192.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B43" content-type="article"><label>43</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Engin M, Donanci S, 2016, Instructional Videos as Part of a ‘Flipped’ Approach in Academic Writing. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 13(1): 73–80.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B44" content-type="article"><label>44</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kordt B, 2018, Affordance Theory and Multiple Language Learning and Teaching. International Journal of Multilingualism, 15(2): 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2016.1223081</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B45" content-type="article"><label>45</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Draffan EA, Rainger P, 2006, A Model for the Identification of Challenges to Blended Learning. ALT-J, 14(1): 55–67.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B46" content-type="article"><label>46</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Baragash RS, Al-Samarraie H, 2018, Blended Learning: Investigating the Influence of Engagement in Multiple Learning Delivery Modes on Students’ Performance. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7): 2082–2098.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B47" content-type="article"><label>47</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Coates H, 2007, A Model of Online and General Campus-Based Student Engagement. Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2): 121–141.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B48" content-type="article"><label>48</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH, 2004, School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1): 59–109.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B49" content-type="article"><label>49</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Van Braak M, Van de Pol J, Poorthuis AM, et al., 2021, A Micro-Perspective on Students’ Behavioral Engagement in the Context of Teachers’ Instructional Support During Seatwork: Sources of Variability and the Role of Teacher Adaptive Support. Contemporary Educational Psychology, (64): 101928.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B50" content-type="article"><label>50</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Martin AJ, Ginns P, Collie RJ, 2023, University Students in COVID-19 Lockdown: The Role of Adaptability and Fluid Reasoning in Supporting Their Academic Motivation and Engagement. Learning and Instruction, (83): 101712.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B51" content-type="article"><label>51</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Appleton JJ, Christenson SL, Furlong MJ, 2008, Student Engagement with School: Critical Conceptual and Methodological Issues of the Construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5): 369386.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B52" content-type="article"><label>52</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhoc KCH, Webster BJ, King RB, et al., 2019, Higher Education Student Engagement Scale (HESES): Development and Psychometric Evidence. Research in Higher Education, (60): 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9510-6</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B53" content-type="article"><label>53</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Martin AJ, n.d., The Motivation and Engagement Scale, Lifelong Achievement Group (1999–2021), viewed July 8, 2023, https://lifelongachievement.com/pages/the-motivation-and-engagement-scale-mes</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B54" content-type="article"><label>54</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Krause KL, Coates H, 2008, Students’ Engagement in First-Year University. Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5): 493–505.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B55" content-type="article"><label>55</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Tardy CH, 1985, Social Support Measurement. American Journal of Community Psychology, (13): 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00905728</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B56" content-type="article"><label>56</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Doménech-Betoret F, Gómez-Artiga A, Abellán-Roselló L, et al., 2020, MOCSE Centered on Students: Validation of Learning Demands and Teacher Support Scales. Frontiers in Psychology, (11): 582926.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B57" content-type="article"><label>57</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zheng W, Yu F, Wu YJ, 2022, Social Media on Blended Learning: The Effect of Rapport and Motivation. Behaviour &amp; Information Technology, 41(9): 1941–1951.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B58" content-type="article"><label>58</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>O’Flaherty J, Phillips C, 2015, The Use of Flipped Classrooms in Higher Education: A Scoping Review. The Internet and Higher Education, (25): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B59" content-type="article"><label>59</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bishop J, Verleger MA, 2013, The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research, 2013 ASEE Annual Conference &amp; Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22585</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B60" content-type="article"><label>60</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chandra V, Watters JJ, 2012, Re-Thinking Physics Teaching with Web-Based Learning. Computers &amp; Education, 58(1): 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.010</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B61" content-type="article"><label>61</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bhagat KK, Cheng CH, Koneru I, et al., 2021, Students’ Blended Learning Course Experience Scale (BLCES): Development and Validation. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6): 3971–3981.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B62" content-type="article"><label>62</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Santos AC, Arriaga P, Daniel JR, et al., 2023, Social and Emotional Competencies as Predictors of Student Engagement in Youth: A Cross-Cultural Multilevel Study. Studies in Higher Education, 48(1): 1–19.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B63" content-type="article"><label>63</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chiu TK, 2022, Applying the Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to Explain Student Engagement in Online Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1): S14–S30.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B64" content-type="article"><label>64</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hsu HCK, Wang CV, Levesque-Bristol C, 2019, Reexamining the Impact of Self-Determination Theory on Learning Outcomes in the Online Learning Environment. Education and Information Technologies, (24): 2159–2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09863-w</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B65" content-type="article"><label>65</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Buhl-Wiggers J, Kjærgaard A, Munk K, 2023, A Scoping Review of Experimental Evidence on Face-to-Face Components of Blended Learning in Higher Education. Studies in Higher Education, 48(1): 151–173.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B66" content-type="article"><label>66</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang ZV, Hyland K, 2022, Fostering Student Engagement with Feedback: An Integrated Approach. Assessing Writing, (51): 100586.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B67" content-type="article"><label>67</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kim S, Cho S, Kim JY, et al., 2023, Statistical Assessment on Student Engagement in Asynchronous Online Learning Using the K-Means Clustering Algorithm. Sustainability, 15(3): 2049.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B68" content-type="article"><label>68</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bruggeman B, Hidding K, Struyven K, et al., 2022, Negotiating Teacher Educators’ Beliefs About Blended Learning: Using Stimulated Recall to Explore Design Choices. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2): 98–112.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B69" content-type="article"><label>69</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Divaharan S, Chia A, 2022, Blended Learning Reimagined: Teaching and Learning in Challenging Contexts. Education Sciences, 12(10): 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100648</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B70" content-type="article"><label>70</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Deci EL, Ryan RM, 2000, The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4): 227–268.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B71" content-type="article"><label>71</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chau S, Cheung C, 2018, Academic Satisfaction with Hospitality and Tourism Education in Macao: The Influence of Active Learning, Academic Motivation, and Student Engagement. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(4): 473–487.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B72" content-type="article"><label>72</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kleynhans C, Roberson J, Nesamvuni A, et al., 2023, The Relationship Between Gender and the Collaborative Learning Experience of University of Technology Students. Africa Education Review, 18(5–6): 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2022.2153067</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
