<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v8i9.8383</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Exploration of University English Teachers’ Acceptance and Willingness to Use Learning Management System Data Analysis Tools</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/8/9/10.26689/jcer.v8i9.8383</url><author>YaoXiaochao</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>9</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2024-09-30</published-time></date></history><abstract>This study investigates university English teachers’ acceptance and willingness to use learning management system (LMS) data analysis tools in their teaching practices. The research employs a mixed-method approach, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to understand teachers’ perceptions and attitudes, and the factors influencing their adoption of LMS data analysis tools. The findings reveal that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, technical literacy, organizational support, and data privacy concerns significantly impact teachers’ willingness to use these tools. Based on these insights, the study offers practical recommendations for educational institutions to enhance the effective adoption of LMS data analysis tools in English language teaching.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Dabbagh N, Kitsantas A, 2012, Personal Learning Environments, Social Media, and Self-Regulated Learning: A Natural Formula for Connecting Formal and Informal Learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1): 3–8.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Alhomoud F, 2020, The Impact of E-Learning on the Development of Students’ English Language Skills: A Case Study of King Khalid University. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 8(1): 1–8.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Nguyen T, 2015, The Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future Horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2): 309–319.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Davis FD, 1989, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3): 319–340.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Teo T, 2011, Factors Influencing Teachers’ Intention to Use Technology: Model Development and Test. Computers &amp; Education, 57(4): 2432–2440.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rogers EM, 2003, Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.), Simon and Schuster, New York.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
