<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v9i1.9541</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>The Limitations of Social Reproduction Theory in Explaining Social Unpaid Work in the Global South</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/9/1/10.26689/jcer.v9i1.9541</url><author>LiuYuqian</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-02-14</published-time></date></history><abstract>This paper defines and explores the concept of social reproduction work, highlighting its significance and the fact that women are its primary contributors. It identifies key social issues faced by social reproduction workers, including marginalization, neglect, and unequal access to resources. Additionally, the study examines the primary challenges encountered by these workers: the lack of direct economic benefits, difficulty in balancing work and family responsibilities, and the significant physical and mental strain associated with unpaid labor. Using the theoretical framework of the capitalist economic system, the paper delves into the root causes of the caregiving crisis. Furthermore, it critiques the applicability of reproduction work theories in explaining unpaid care work in the Global South. Three key limitations are outlined: the neglect of informal economic systems in the Global South, persistent gender inequality, and the dynamic nature of global economic migration.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Laslett B, Brenner J, 1993, Gender and Social Reproduction: Historical Perspectives. Annual Review of Sociology, 15(1): 381–404.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Fraser N, 2016, Capitalism’s Crisis of Care. Dissent, 63(4): 30–37.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hochschild AR, Machung A, 1989, The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home, Viking Penguin, New York.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wood J, 2018, 104 Countries Have Laws that Prevent Women from Working in Some Jobs, World Economic Forum, viewed December 20, 2024, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2018/08/104-countries-have-laws-that-prevent-women-from-working-in-some-jobs/</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Folbre N, 2024, Care Provision and the Boundaries of Production. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 38(1): 201–220.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
