<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v9i11.13024</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Research and Practice of a Knowledge Graph-Driven Inquiry-Construction Double-Helix Teaching Model in High School Mathematics</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/9/11/10.26689/jcer.v9i11.13024</url><author>LiDeqiang,ZhangHaiying</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>11</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-12-12</published-time></date></history><abstract>In the context of the “Two New” initiatives, high school mathematics instruction still grapples with three interlocking problems: knowledge fragmentation, limited cultivation of higher-order thinking, and weak alignment among teaching, learning, and assessment. To counter these challenges, we propose an Inquiry–Construction Double-Helix model that uses a domain-specific knowledge graph as its cognitive spine. The model interweaves two mutually reinforcing strands—student-driven inquiry and systematic knowledge construction—into a double-helix trajectory analogous to DNA replication. The Inquiry Strand is launched by authentic, situation-based tasks that shepherd students through the complete cycle: question → hypothesis → verification → reflection. The Construction Strand simultaneously externalizes, restructures, and internalizes core disciplinary concepts via visual, hierarchical knowledge graphs. Within the flow of a lesson, the two strands alternately dominate and scaffold each other, securing the co-development of conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, and mathematical literacy. Empirical evidence demonstrates that this model significantly enhances students’ systematic knowledge integration, problem-solving transfer ability, and core mathematical competencies, offering a replicable and operable teaching paradigm and practical pathway for deepening high school mathematics classroom reform.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen P, Lu Y, Zheng VW, et al., 2018, KnowEdu: A System to Construct Knowledge Graph for Education. IEEE Access, 6: 31553–31563.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Knewton, 2021, The Knewton Adaptive Learning White Paper, Knewton Inc.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Liu S, He TH, Dai JH, 2021, A Survey of CRF Algorithm Based Knowledge Extraction of Elementary Mathematics in Chinese. Mobile Networks and Applications, 26: 1891–1903.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Xu B, Li Y, Zhang T, et al., 2022, CN-DBpedia: A Never-Ending Chinese Knowledge Extraction System. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 73: 241–256.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhao H, Wang M, Li P, 2023, Embedding Knowledge Graphs in Classroom Teaching: A Systematic Review. Interactive Learning Environments, 2023.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang F, Liu Q, 2023, Exploring the Role of Knowledge Graphs in Supporting Classroom Inquiry and Construction: A Case Study in High School Mathematics. Computers &amp; Education, 190: 104621.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bybee RW, Taylor JA, Gardner A, et al., 2019, The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Creating Teachable Moments, 2nd ed., NSTA Press.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Schoenfeld AH, 2020, Mathematical Practices, in Theory and Practice. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 52(6): 1163–1174.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Huang R, Leung KS, 2021, Formulating Inquiry-Based Mathematics Classrooms in East Asia: Opportunities and Constraints. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53(2): 265–277.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang L, Wang J, Chen X, et al., 2022, Balancing Exploration and Systematicity in Inquiry-Based Mathematics Learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2): 211–228.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
