<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v9i12.13293</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>An Analysis of the Double Reduction Policy: Structural Incentives, Academic Pressure, and the Persistence of Shadow Education</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/9/12/10.26689/jcer.v9i12.13293</url><author>WangWeichen</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-12-31</published-time></date></history><abstract>This paper studies China’s Double Reduction Policy and its limits. Before 2021, shadow education grew very fast. Low teacher pay, weak school autonomy, and strong exam pressure created a large space for private tutoring. Families worried that their children would fall behind, so they spent more time and money on after-school classes. The policy aimed to cut homework and reduce off-campus tutoring. After it was introduced, some big tutoring companies closed or changed their business. At the same time, many smaller and hidden forms of tutoring appeared. Survey evidence shows that gaps between rich and poor families in tutoring and study time remained large, and in some cases even grew. The paper links these outcomes to teacher incentives, local fiscal constraints, and deep cultural beliefs about exams, merit, and education. It argues that regulation alone cannot ease student stress or reduce educational inequality without broader structural and cultural change.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>General Office of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, General Office of the State Council, 2021, Opinions on Further Reducing the Homework Burden and Off-campus Training Burden of Students in the Compulsory Education Stage, viewed November 10, 2025, https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-07/24/content_5627132.htm</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Dai K, 2023, Double Reduction Policy in Education Industry and Firm Values: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 54: 103696.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang W, 2021, Effective Implementation of the “Double Reduction” Policy Has Returned to the Essence of Education, Enabling Children to Grow Up in a Comprehensive and Healthy Manner, viewed November 10, 2025, https://m.gmw.cn/baijia/2021-10/26/35259346.html</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Guo L, 2022, Internal Coordination and External Balance: The Optimized Path for Income Distribution of University Teachers, Chongqing Association of Higher Education, 22. https://www.cqgjxh.com/upload/file/202205/1652796484743057.pdf</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang W, Bray M, 2020, Comparative Research on Shadow Education: Achievements, Challenges, and the Agenda Ahead. European Journal of Education, 55(3): 322–341.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bregnbæk S, 2024, Fragile Elite, Stanford University Press.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Mok KH, 2000, Marketizing Higher Education in Post-Mao China. International Journal of Educational Development, 20(2): 109–126.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CCCPC), 1985, Decision on the Reform of the Education System, viewed November 10, 2025, http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe_177/200407/2482.html</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Tsang MC, Education and National Development in China since 1949: Oscillating Policies and Enduring Dilemmas. The China Quarterly, 161: 199–230.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang W, Bray M, 2020, Comparative Education in China: Privatization and Shadow Education. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bray M, 2009, Confronting the Shadow Education System: What Government Policies for What Private Tutoring? UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning, Paris.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li Z, 2022, The Implementation Dilemmas of the Double Reduction Policy in China. Chinese Education &amp; Society, 55(3): 177–195.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhou J, Liu Y, Ma J, et al., 2024, Prevalence of Depressive Symptoms among Children and Adolescents in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 18(1).</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, Report on National Mental Health Development in China (2019–2020), Social Sciences Academic Press, Beijing.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Oldehinkel AJ, Ormel J, 2014, A Longitudinal Perspective on Childhood Adversities and Onset Risk of Various Psychiatric Disorders. European Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry, 24(6): 641–650.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Has the ‘Double Reduction’ Policy Relieved Stress? A Follow-up Study on Chinese Adolescents, 2022, Child &amp; Adolescent Psychiatry &amp; Mental Health, 16(1): 1–10.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sina Finance, 2021, ‘Shuangjian’ Policy Implementation Has Greatly Reduced the Number of Off-campus Training Institutions, viewed November 10, 2025, https://finance.sina.com.cn/tech/2021-09-08/doc-iktzscyx3003163.shtml</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Xinhua News Agency, 2022, Why Are Korean Students So Stressed? Education, Competition, and Social Pressure, Xinhua News, viewed November 10, 2025, https://www.news.cn/fashion/20220613/d758c8f201cf4004ba30560553370291/c.html</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Shin JY, Park H, 2024, Shadow Education, Parental Pressure, and Student Well-Being in South Korea: Implications for Education Reform. International Journal of Educational Development, 107: 102874.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20" content-type="article"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (MOE), 2021, Notice on the Issuance of the 14th Five-Year County-level Ordinary High School Development and Improvement Action Plan, viewed November 10, 2025, http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A29/202212/t20221212_1032088.html</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21" content-type="article"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Fu W, Guo S, 2024, Implementation of the ‘Double Reduction’ Policy and New Education Inequality, Modern Education Management, http://dianda.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/ReadIndex?id=7112303660</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B22" content-type="article"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhou Z, Lei X, Shen Y, 2023, Educational Burden Reduction, Household Education Expenditures, and Educational Equity. China Economic Quarterly, 23(3): 842–859.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B23" content-type="article"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li J, 2012, Cultural Foundations of Learning: East and West, Cambridge University Press.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
