<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v9i12.13310</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Research on the Evaluation Index System for Open University Faculty Based on FAHP</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/9/12/10.26689/jcer.v9i12.13310</url><author>WuJian,HuangWenyan</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-12-31</published-time></date></history><abstract>As a key platform serving lifelong learning for all citizens, faculty at open universities shoulder multiple responsibilities, including distance teaching, learning support, and career transition services. However, traditional faculty evaluation systems often suffer from unclear evaluation objectives, rigid indicator design, and subjective weight allocation. They particularly overlook the characteristics of distance education and the value of support services, making it difficult to fully reflect the faculty’s actual contributions. To address these challenges, this study centers on developmental evaluation principles, integrating fuzzy mathematics with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to construct a scientific evaluation system tailored to the teaching characteristics of open universities. It aims to overcome the evaluation pitfalls of “prioritizing research over service” and “emphasizing outcomes over processes,” providing a systematic solution for faculty professional development and educational quality enhancement.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Huang Y, Wang Y, 2022, Construction of an Open University Faculty Evaluation System Based on Teacher Development. Journal of Inner Mongolia Open University, (05): 96–102.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Dong C, Jiang C, 2023, Research on Teacher Evaluation in Open Universities in the New Era. Journal of Shandong Open University, (03): 17–19.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wu J, Liu C, Xia H, 2015, Application and Modification of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Evaluation System Modeling. Statistics and Decision Making, (20): 77–79.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang Y, Pi W, Wu Z, et al., 2024, Evaluation Framework for Online Learning Behavior: Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), (05): 1–10.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sun M, Wang H, 2021, Economic Evaluation of Composite Timber Structures Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 49(07): 111–115.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Dong Y, Liu L, 2025, How Universities Evaluate Faculty Research Social Impact: A Case Study of Three Foreign Universities. Higher Education Development and Evaluation, 41(01): 13–23 + 129–130.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cao G, Wang H, 2022, Focusing on Enhancing University Faculty’s Online Teaching Capabilities. China Higher Education, (20): 54–56.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang S, Yuan Y, Peng X, 2020, Research on the Sustainable Development of Open Educational Resources in China’s Open University. China Educational Technology, (08): 119–126.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhao F, 2023, Teaching Evaluation of University Faculty in the New Era: Reflection and Reconstruction. Higher Education Management, 17(04): 114–124.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li H, Yang X, 2022, The Four-Dimensional Matrix and Characteristics of Academic Evaluation Indicators for Faculty at the University of Warwick. Tsinghua University Journal of Education Research, 43(04): 94–101.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
