<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v9i12.13541</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Visualization Analysis of Hotspots and Trends in Chinese and Foreign Digital Teaching Research Based on CiteSpace (2015–2025)</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/9/12/10.26689/jcer.v9i12.13541</url><author>LuHao,ZhangQiong</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-12-31</published-time></date></history><abstract>This study employs CiteSpace to perform a visual comparative analysis of digital teaching literature from CNKI and Web of Science spanning 2015 to 2025. It systematically elucidates the evolutionary trajectories, structural characteristics, and theoretical orientations present in both Chinese and international research. The findings reveal significant disparities: Chinese research predominantly emphasizes practical applications, concentrating on “digital literacy” and “vocational education” within specific teaching contexts. In contrast, international research prioritizes theoretical frameworks related to “technology integration,” “teacher competence,” and “online learning,” demonstrating greater theoretical depth and interdisciplinary integration. Since 2017, international publications have consistently outpaced China’s output, achieving a volume 2.3 times greater than that of China by 2025. This trend indicates notable advantages in adapting to technological advancements and enhancing academic productivity. Therefore, this study advocates for the strengthening of complementarity and integration between these research paradigms to promote the coordinated development of global educational digitalization across both theoretical and practical dimensions.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>The CPC Central Committee, The State Council, 2019, China Education Modernization 2035, viewed October 26, 2025, http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6052/moe_838/201902/t20190223_370857.html</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yang ZK, 2024, Promoting Digital Education Quality via the National Smart Education Public Service Platform. People’s Education, (05): 49–52.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lan GS, et al., 2024, Bridging the Digital Divide: NETP 2024 Insights. Open Education Research, 30(02): 59–68.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang M, 2019, UK’s Education Technology Strategy Analysis. World Education Information, 32(17): 21–27.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Caena F, Redecker C, 2019, DigCompEdu: Aligning Teacher Competence Frameworks. European Journal of Education, 54(3): 398–412.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Liu J, et al., 2022, Higher-Order Thinking Visualization via HistCite/CiteSpace. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(6): 635–645.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Liu CD, Tan CX, 2019, Big Data-Era Ideological Education Bibliometrics. School Party Building and Ideological Education, (04): 50–54.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kong LS, Fan YS, 2021, Chinese Comparative Education Research (Past Decade). Comparative Education Review, (05): 13–25.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Borba MC, Chiari ASS, de Almeida HRFL, 2018, Interactions in Virtual Learning Environments: New Roles for Digital Technology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 98(3): 269–286.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li J, Sun W, Liu JJ, 2024, Research on the Construction of Autonomous Knowledge System of Marketing Discipline in China: A CiteSpace Visualization Analysis Based on the Main Literature of Marketing Discipline from 2013 to 2022. Enterprises economic lancet, (6): 77–86.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
