<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v9i5.10746</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Research on the Construction and Practice of an Evidence-Based Value-Added Evaluation System Based on Data-Driven</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/9/5/10.26689/jcer.v9i5.10746</url><author>YangLingduo,XuLili,XuYan,PengFurong,ZhangShuai</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>5</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-06-04</published-time></date></history><abstract>Based on the educational evaluation reform, this study explores the construction of an evidence-based value-added evaluation system based on data-driven, aiming to solve the limitations of traditional evaluation methods. The research adopts the method of combining theoretical analysis and practical application, and designs the evidence-based value-added evaluation framework, which includes the core elements of a multi-source heterogeneous data acquisition and processing system, a value-added evaluation agent based on a large model, and an evaluation implementation and application mechanism. Through empirical research verification, the evaluation system has remarkable effects in improving learning participation, promoting ability development, and supporting teaching decision-making, and provides a theoretical reference and practical path for educational evaluation reform in the new era. The research shows that the evidence-based value-added evaluation system based on data-driven can reflect students’ actual progress more fairly and objectively by accurately measuring the difference in starting point and development range of students, and provide strong support for the realization of high-quality education development.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang M, 2020, Education Evaluation Reform and School Transformation. Educational Research, 41(6): 4–11.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, The State Council, 2020, The Overall Plan for Deepening the Reform of Education Evaluation in the New Era, viewed March 25, 2025, https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-10/13/content_5551032.htm</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Liu T, Wang Z, 2019, The Reform and Reconstruction of Education Evaluation in the Era of Big Data. Educational Research, 40(7): 143–150.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sanders WL, Horn SP, 1994, The Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS): Mixed-Model Methodology in Educational Assessment. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8: 299–311.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sanders WL, 1998, Value-Added Assessment. School Administrator, 55(11): 24–27.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yang B, Li W, 2021, The Theoretical Basis and Practical Path of Value-Added Evaluation. Educational Research, 42(5): 88–97.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Slavin RE, 2002, Evidence-Based Education Policies: Transforming Educational Practice and Research. Educational Researcher, 31(7): 15–21.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Siemens G, Baker RSJD, 2012, Learning Analytics and Educational Data Mining: Towards Communication and Collaboration, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 252–254.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen M, Zhang J, 2020, Technological Progress and Application Status of Educational Big Data Analysis. China Educational Technology, 2020(9): 12–19.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang S, Xu T, Li H, et al., 2024, Large Language Models for Education: A Survey and Outlook. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.18105</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Huang R, Yang J, 2022, Intelligent Education Evaluation: Connotation, Technology and Path. E-Education Research, 43(2): 5–12.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Qian M, Zhao L, 2023, Big Data Empowering Undergraduate Teaching Quality Evaluation: Value Implication, Realistic Dilemma and Path Choice. Chongqing Higher Education Research, 11(2): 57–66.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wright R, Yang J, 2023, AI-Enabled Formative Assessment: A Systematic Review. Computers &amp; Education, 196: 104794.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chai T, Gao J, Zhao M, et al., 2024, Thoughts on the Construction of the Evaluation System for the Quality of Postgraduate Cultivation Based on Value-Added Evaluation. Computer Education, 2024(01): 46–50.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Morgan J, Stone L, 2023, Evidence-Based Decision Making in Educational Leadership. Educational Leadership Review, 24(1): 83–97.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
