<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Contemporary Educational Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-8466</issn><eissn>2208-8474</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcer.v9i7.11338</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Research on the Application of Digital Modeling Technology in Nixing Pottery from the Perspective of Maker Education Theory</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCER/9/7/10.26689/jcer.v9i7.11338</url><author>LyuJiaqing,BaiXue,LiaoZhi</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>7</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-07-31</published-time></date></history><abstract>In the context of global digital transformation and the rising prominence of maker education, this study explores the innovative integration of digital modeling technologies with traditional Nixing Pottery craftsmanship. By constructing a teaching framework under maker education theory, the research investigates how 3D modeling, CAD design, and 3D printing technologies can empower learners to address challenges in cultural heritage preservation and artistic innovation. Through experimental teaching and case analysis, the study verifies that this integrated approach significantly enhances learners’ digital literacy, creative thinking, and cultural identity while optimizing Nixing Pottery’s production processes and design possibilities. The findings contribute to theoretical models of technology-enhanced craft education and provide practical pathways for the digital transformation of intangible cultural heritage.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen R, 2020, Research on the Application of Innovative Thinking Tools in Maker Education: A Case Study of the Osborn Checklist. Technology-based Entrepreneurship, 30(5): 12–18.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang Y, 2020, Research Progress on Ceramic Light-curing 3D Printing Technology. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 56(11): 1–12.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Huang Z, 2022, Exploration of Professional Practice Teaching of Xiaoxing Pottery in Qinzhou. China Ceramic Industry, 29(2): 56–60.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li K, et al., 2019, A Review of Maker Education in China Based on CNKI. Modern Educational Technology, 29(3): 18–24.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Liu Y, 2021, Research Progress of Virtual Reality Technology in Cultural Heritage Protection. Cultural Relics Conservation and Archaeological Science, 33(3): 1–10.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Blikstein P, 2013, Digital Fabrication and ‘Making’ in Education: The Democratization of Invention, Transcript Publishers, Bielefeld.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Halverson ER, Sheridan K, 2014, The Maker Movement in Education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4): 495–504.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Vossoughi S, Bevan B, 2016, Maker-Centered Learning: Empowering Young People to Shape Their Worlds. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2): 1–62.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhu Q, Zhang L, Ding Y, 2021, From 3D Modeling to Digital Twin Modeling. Journal of Surveying and Mapping, 50(8): 1025–1036.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Qin Z, 2021, Research Status of Qinzhou Xiaoxing Pottery. Journal of Beibu Gulf University, 36(4): 78–83.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
