JCNRJournal of Clinical and Nursing Research2208-36852208-3693Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/jcnr.v10i7.15438ArticleA Scoping Review of Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids for Patients with Peripheral Arterial Diseasehttps://artdesignp.com/journal/JCNR/10/7/10.26689/jcnr.v10i7.15438LuJiabei,TaoYuexian,LouQiuying,LiuYating,XuYeqin,QiuSiying20261072026-07-31Objective: To review the current evidence on shared decision-making (SDM) and patient decision aids (PDAs) for patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD), focusing on application characteristics, intervention effects, and implementation factors to inform clinical decision support models. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search was performed in eight Chinese and English databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and the China Biomedical Literature Database, up to 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, qualitative studies, and mixed-methods studies. Data were extracted and descriptively synthesized. Results: Fifteen studies published between 2011 and 2025 were included, mainly from Europe, North America, and Asia. Studies explored SDM preferences, the development and application of PDAs, decision support tools, SDM training, multimedia decision-making interventions, and patients’ experiences. SDM and PDAs improved patient knowledge, participation, decision quality, and satisfaction, while reducing decisional conflict and negative emotions. Implementation was affected by time constraints, information complexity, provider–patient communication, and healthcare system factors. Conclusion: SDM and PDA research in PAD is increasing; however, tool standardization and clinical integration remain limited. Future research should develop patient-centered decision-support tools and promote nurse-led SDM models to improve long-term PAD management and patient decision-making experiences.

Gornik H, Aronow H, Goodney P, et al., 2024, 2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation, 149(24): e1313–e1410.

Conte M, Bradbury A, Kolh P, et al., 2019, Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 69(6): 3S–125S.e40.

Mazzolai L, Tura G, Lanzi S, et al., 2024, 2024 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Peripheral Arterial and Aortic Diseases. European Heart Journal, 45(36): 3538–3700.

Criqui M, Matsushita K, Aboyans V, et al., 2021, Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Contemporary Epidemiology, Management Gaps, and Future Directions: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 144(9): e171–e191.

Stacey D, Lewis K, Smith M, et al., 2024, Decision Aids for People Facing Health Treatment or Screening Decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2024(1): CD001431.

Friesen-Storms J, Bours G, van der Weijden T, et al., 2015, Shared Decision Making in Chronic Care in the Context of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(1): 393–402.

Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al., 2012, Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(10): 1361–1367.

Yu A, Ding J, Davies A, et al., 2024, A Scoping Review of Decision Support Tools for Patients with Lower Extremity Arterial Disease: Towards Shared Decision-Making. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 106: 25–36.

Kooijman M, van Leeuwen G, Schuurmann R, et al., 2025, Shared Decision-Making in Patients with an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm or Peripheral Artery Disease: A Scoping Review. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 112: 193–221.

Arksey H, O’Malley L, 2005, Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1): 19–32.

Tricco A, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al., 2018, PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7): 467–473.

Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, et al., 2020, Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute.

Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T, 1997, Shared Decision-Making in the Medical Encounter: What Does It Mean? (Or It Takes At least Two to Tango). Social Science & Medicine, 44(5): 681–692.

de Mik S, Stubenrouch F, Bollen T, et al., 2020, Development of Three Different Decision Support Tools to Support Shared Decision-Making in Vascular Surgery. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(2): 369–376.

Stubenrouch F, Peters L, de Mik S, et al., 2022, Improving Shared Decision Making in Vascular Surgery: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 64(1): 73–81.

Chen R, Xing T, Zhang R, et al., 2022, Observation on the Effectiveness of a Shared Decision-Making Health Education Intervention Among Patients with Lower Limb Atherosclerotic Occlusive Disease. Heilongjiang Medicine, 46(11): 1383–1385.

Ma H, Zhao W, Li H, 2024, Effectiveness of Shared Decision-Making Nursing Based on the Theory of Information Asymmetry in Patients with Diabetic Peripheral Arterial Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty. Chinese Journal of Folk Medicine, 36(23): 118–122.

Marcellis L, Rutgers K, Spruijt S, et al., 2025, A Guideline-Based Preference Elicitation Tool to Enhance Shared Decision-Making in Supervised Exercise Therapy for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: A Process Evaluation. Annals of Medicine, 57(1): 2540022.

Jayasooriya G, Shalhoub J, Thapar A, et al., 2011, Patient Preference in the Management of Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis. International Journal of Surgery, 9(7): 508–510.

Corriere M, Avise J, Peterson L, et al., 2015, Exploring Patient Involvement in Decision Making for Vascular Procedures. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 62(4): 1032–1039.e2.

Peters L, Stubenrouch F, Thijs J, et al., 2022, Predictors of the Level of Shared Decision-Making in Vascular Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 64(1): 83–91.

Norvell D, Henderson A, Czerniecki J, 2021, The Development and Usability of the AMPREDICT Decision Support Tool: A Mixed Methods Study. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 45(6): 34–41.

Smolderen K, Pacheco C, Provance J, et al., 2021, Treatment Decisions for Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease and Symptoms of Claudication: Development Process and Alpha Testing of the SHOW-ME PAD Decision Aid. Vascular Medicine, 26(3): 273–280.

Czerniecki J, Gibbons K, McClure E, et al., 2022, Focus Group Study of Factors Relevant to Treatment Decisions and Experiences Among Patients with Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 76(5): 1316–1324.

Monaro S, West S, Gullick J, 2024, Making Decisions About Amputation for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischaemia. Journal of Vascular Nursing, 42(1): 65–73.

Czerniecki J, Matlock D, Henderson A, et al., 2024, Development of the AMPDECIDE Decision Aid to Facilitate Shared Decision Making in Patients Facing Amputation Secondary to Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia. Journal of Surgical Research, 299: 68–75.

Hojen A, Dahl M, Nicolajsen C, et al., 2025, Patients’ Perspectives of Patient-Clinician Communication in Peripheral Arterial Disease Care: “I Didn’t Feel Like I Was in Tune with Him”. Seminars in Vascular Surgery, 38(4): 376–379.

Sjödin L, Lapidus L, Torbjörnsson E, 2025, Perspectives on Communicating Information and Shared Decision-Making in Patients Undergoing Transtibial Amputation. Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews, 12(4): 213–222.