<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCNR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Clinical and Nursing Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-3685</issn><eissn>2208-3693</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcnr.v8i2.5899</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>A Clinical Randomized Controlled Study of Low-Frequency rTMS Therapy on Lower Limb Motor Dysfunction after Stroke</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCNR/8/2/10.26689/jcnr.v8i2.5899</url><author>HuangKaiqi,JieXizhen,LiXiaoyan,LiangZhaoming</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2024-02-26</published-time></date></history><abstract>Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of lower limb motor dysfunction after stroke. Methods: A total of 96 patients with stroke and lower limb motor dysfunction were enrolled in this study, and were randomly divided into the experimental group and the sham stimulation group using the method of calculator-generated random numbers. Both groups received conventional medication and rehabilitation therapy. The experimental group received 4 weeks of 1 Hz rTMS treatment in the primary cortical motor area (M1) of the healthy side, with the treatment coil tangent to the skull surface; the sham stimulation group underwent the same procedures as the experimental group, but the treatment coil was perpendicular to the skull surface instead. Lower-extremity subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-LE), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), gait analysis, and lower-extremity surface electromyography (LESEM) were performed in both groups before and after rTMS treatment. Results: All 96 patients completed the test with no shedding and no adverse reactions. After treatment, the FMA-LE score and BBS score of the 2 groups of patients were significantly improved as compared with the pre-treatment (P &amp;lt; 0.05), and the TUG test time was reduced as compared with the pre-treatment (P &amp;lt; 0.05). The true stimulation group had greater improvement in all assessment indexes than that of the sham stimulation group (P &amp;lt; 0.05). After treatment, the electromyographic activity of the tibialis anterior and rectus femoris muscles in the true simulation group improved significantly. The step length, step speed, and step frequency were also significantly improved in both groups after treatment, and the symmetrical ratio of step length and support time was reduced (P &amp;lt; 0.05). Comparison between the groups revealed that the true simulation group significantly improved after rTMS treatment as compared to the sham stimulation group (P &amp;lt; 0.05). Conclusion: 1Hz rTMS treatment safely and effectively improved motor and balance function in patients with post-stroke lower limb motor dysfunction.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Norrving B, Kissela B, 2013, The Global Burden of Stroke and Need for a Continuum of Care. Neurology, 80(3 Suppl 2): S5–S12.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Dworzynski K, Ritchie G, Fenu E, et al., 2013, Rehabilitation after Stroke: Summary of NICE Guidance. BMJ, 2013: 346.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cassidy JM, Gillick BT, Carey JR, 2014, Priming the Brain to Capitalize on Metaplasticity in Stroke Rehabilitation. Physical Therapy, 94(1): 139–150.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li Y, Fan J, Yang J, et al., 2018, Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Walking and Balance Function after Stroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2018:1.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kang N, Summers JJ, Cauraugh JH, 2016, Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Improves Paretic Limb Force Production: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Brain Stimulation, 9(5): 662–670.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW, 2005, The Timed Up and Go Test: Its Reliability and Association with Lower-Limb Impairments and Locomotor Capacities in People with Chronic Stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine &amp; Rehabilitation, 86(8):1641–1647.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Thickbroom GW, 2007, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Synaptic Plasticity: Experimental Framework and Human Models. Exp Brain Res, 180(4): 583–593.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ichiro M, Hajime Y, Ichiro O, et al., 2010, Premotor Cortex is Involved inRestoration of Gait in Stroke. Annals of Neurology, 52(2): 188–194.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cirillo G, Di Pino G, Capone F, et al., 2017, Neurobiological After-Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation. Brain</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Stimul, 10(1): 1–18.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang JX, Voss JL, 2015, Long-Lasting Enhancements of Memory and Hippocampal-Cortical Functional</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Connectivity Following Multiple-Day Targeted Noninvasive Stimulation. Hippocampus, 25(8): 877-883.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rastgoo M, Naghdi S, Nakhostin AN, et al., 2016, Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Lower Extremity Spasticity and Motor Function in Stroke Patients. Disabil Rehabil, 38(19): 1918–1926.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Forogh B, Ahadi T, Nazari M, et al., 2017, The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Postural Stability after Acute Stroke: A Clinical Trial. Basic Clin Neurosci, 8(5): 405–411.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wiethoff S, Hamada M, Rothwell JC, 2014, Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Motor Cortex. Brain Stimulation, 7(3): 468–475.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
