JCNRJournal of Clinical and Nursing Research2208-36852208-3693Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/jcnr.v8i5.7360ArticleThe Effect of the Direct Anti-Human Globulin Test on the Clinical Outcome of Patients Receiving Blood Transfusionhttps://artdesignp.com/journal/JCNR/8/5/10.26689/jcnr.v8i5.7360NiuBen,WangLe2024852024-06-24Objective: To study the effect of the direct anti-human globulin test on the clinical efficacy of blood transfusion patients. Methods: 52 transfused patients were selected for this study, of which 26 cases with positive direct anti-human globulin tests were included in the positive group, and another 26 cases with negative direct anti-human globulin tests were included in the negative group. The apparent efficacy of the patients in the two groups after blood transfusion was compared. Results: After blood transfusion, the apparent efficacy of the negative group was significantly higher, P < 0.05; in the positive group, the proportion of the predominantly multi-antibody group was the highest; after blood transfusion, the post-transfusion apparent efficacy of the simple IgG group was higher than that of the multi-antibody group, P < 0.05; comparing the intensity of the different antibodies resulted in the 1+ group, and the 3+ to 4+ groups were significantly lower after blood transfusion, P < 0.05. Conclusion: The use of the direct antiglobulin test in transfused patients showed that patients with positive results would have better clinical efficacy. Direct anti-human globulin tests will have an impact on the clinical efficacy of blood transfusion in patients with positive results, so it is very important to carry out a direct anti-human globulin test on blood transfusion patients.

Duan B, Wang S, Lian J, et al., 2021, Clinical Significance of Direct Anti-Human Globulin Test in the Efficacy of Blood Transfusion in Patients. Clinical Blood Transfusion and Testing, 23(02): 189–191.

Su R, Hu M, Zhao G, et al., 2023, Impact of Direct Anti-Human Globulin Test on the Clinical Efficacy of Blood Transfusion Patients. Electronic Journal of Modern Medicine and Health Research, 7(16): 141–144.

Wei D, Cao C, Li S, 2023, Study on the Relationship Between Positive Typing of Direct Anti-Human Globulin Test and Efficacy of Blood Transfusion. Journal of Aerospace Medicine, 34(07): 779–782.

Kang X, Peng W, Wei S, 2022, Discussion on the Relationship Between Positive Typing of Direct Anti-Human Globulin Test and the Efficacy of Blood Transfusion. Clinical Blood Transfusion and Laboratory, 24(03): 338–342.

Jia B, Qiao S, 2022, Analysis of the Clinical Value of Pre-Transfusion Irregular Antibody Screening and Direct Anti-Human Globulin Test. China Practical Medicine, 17(14): 85–87.

Qiu C, Wang Y, Fu X, et al., 2023, Evaluation of Disease Distribution and Transfusion Efficacy in Patients with Positive Direct Anti-Human Globulin Test. Clinical Medicine Research and Practice, 8(15): 17–20.

Wu F, Xu Y, Liao R, 2023, Diagnostic Value of Direct Anti-Human Globulin Test and Irregular Antibody Screening for Hemolytic Disease in Newborns. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 22(15): 1653–1656.

Yin X, Quan J, Chai F, 2023, Clinical Study on Cross-Matching Method for Direct Anti-Human Globulin Test-Positive Patients. Health Home, 2023(9): 108–110.

Wang M, Yan X, 2022, Comparison of the Application Effect of Microplate Polyglutamine Method and Anti-Human Globulin Microplate Method in Pre-Transfusion Irregular Antibody Screening. Clinical Medicine Research and Practice, 7(21): 114–117.

Wu HE, 2022, Comparison of the Value of Anti-Human Globulin Microcolumn Gel Method and Coagulant Amine Method for Crossmatching. Chinese Journal of Modern Medicine, 24(5): 75–77.