<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCNR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Clinical and Nursing Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-3685</issn><eissn>2208-3693</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcnr.v8i6.7062</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Antibody Pattern: Correlation of Age and Gender in ANA and Anti-ds-DNA Prevalence</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCNR/8/6/10.26689/jcnr.v8i6.7062</url><author>AhmedUsama,MallickHijazi,KhanAmber,ZubairMuhammad</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>6</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2024-07-18</published-time></date></history><abstract>The study was designed to find the prevalence of ANA antibodies and anti-dsDNA antibodies in samples tested at AFIP Rawalpindi and their correlation with age and gender and to find positive and negative predictive values of ANA antibodies. For this purpose, twelve thousand nine hundred sixty-seven (12,967) patients were analyzed for ANA with four hundred sixty-eight (468) healthy samples tested as control and four thousand seven hundred three (4,703) patients tested for ds-DNA antibodies. Retrospective data of all samples tested by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) for ANA antibodies and dsDNA antibodies was collected. To address positive and negative predictive values another control group (autoimmunity not suspected) of serum samples was taken from the healthy population. For the first group, age, gender, ANA antibodies and ds-DNA antibodies results (both tests performed by IIF) data was collected from a computer record cell; for the second control group, ANA antibodies were performed by IIF. 12,967 and 4,703 samples (Group 1) were tested for ANA antibodies and dsDNA antibodies, respectively, during this period. 1,119 (9%) and 99 (2%) were found positive for ANA antibodies and ds DNA antibodies. Among these positive samples, 850 (76%) and 73 (74%) were females respectively. Gender predisposition towards autoimmunity (ANA) was found significant with a P value of (P = 0.001). Relation of age was also found significant with anti-ANA antibodies with a P value of (P = 0.001). This study shows a negative correlation between age (P = 0.025) and gender (P = 0.001) with anti-dsDNA which is also significant. High prevalence was found below the mean age of 38 years (SD ± 16.635) for ANA antibodies and the mean age of 35 years (SD ± 15.066) for ds-DNA antibodies. The age of ANA antibodies and dsDNA antibodies positive patients ranged from 1 year old to 98 years old and 2 years old to 95 years old respectively. In the second (autoimmunity-free) control group, a total of 468 samples were tested for ANA antibodies and 9 (2%) were found positive. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 8.6% and negative predictive value (NPV) was 98%. ANA is a sensitive test for autoimmunity and it is significantly related to female gender and increasing age. The low prevalence of ANA antibodies among clinically suspected cases suggests that rationalization of test prescriptions is needed. Anti-ds-DNA is also a sensitive test for diagnosis of SLE and it is significantly related to female gender and increasing age.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pisetsky DS, 2023, Pathogenesis of Autoimmune Disease. Nature Reviews Nephrology, 19(8): 509–524.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Anis S, Fatima A, Abdul Jabbar S, et al., 2023, ANA-specific Antibodies, ANA Patterns, Anti-ds-DNA Results, and Clinical Diagnosis: A Laboratory and Clinical Audit. Immunologic Research, 71(2): 267–275.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Xiao Y, Lin Y, Zhang Y, et al., 2022, Factors Associated with the Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Titer of Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases in ANA-positive Patients After Treatment: A Retrospective Study. Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 22(3): 439–446.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rubio J, Kyttaris VC, 2023, Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease: Comprehensive Review. Current Rheumatology Reports, 25(5): 98–106.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Tsoi A, Nikolopoulos D, Parodis I, 2024, Advances in the Pharmacological Management of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy, 25(6): 705–716.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Brito-Zeron P, Retamozo S, Ramos-Casals M, 2023, Sjögren’s Syndrome. Medicina Clinical, 160(4): 163–171.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hussaini HM, Seo B, Rich AM, 2022, Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence, Oral Biology: Molecular Techniques and Applications, Springer, New York, 439–450.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Abbas Z, Asim M, Saeed A, et al., 2021, The Spectrum of Autoimmune Liver Disorders, Clinical Presentation, and Autoantibodies in Patients from a Tertiary Care Center in Pakistan. Cureus, 13(11): e19789.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Baig S, Paik JJ, 2020, Inflammatory Muscle Disease: An Update. Best Practice &amp; Research Clinical Rheumatology, 34(1): 101484.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Granito A, Muratori L, Tovoli F, et al., 2021, Diagnostic Role of Anti-dsDNA Antibodies: Do Not Forget Autoimmune Hepatitis. Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 17(4): 244.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhan M, Wang Z, Bao H, et al., 2023, Antibodies Against Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) Potentiate Clinical Performance of Anti-double-stranded DNA Antibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Clinical Immunology, 2023(249): 109297.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>He S, Wu X, Li L, et al., 2023, A Comparison of the Chemiluminescence Immunoassay and Crithidia luciliae Immunofluorescence Test in Detecting Anti-dsDNA Antibodies and Assessing the Activity of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Lupus, 32(8): 936–941.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>De Oliveira NT, Silva NG, Dos Santos TAG, et al., 2020, Clinical and Autoantibody Profile in Male and Female Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Retrospective Study in 603 Brazilian Patients. European Journal of Rheumatology, 7(4): 164.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Tsouris Z, Liaskos C, Dardiotis E, et al., 2020, A Comprehensive Analysis of Antigen-specific Autoimmune Liver Disease-related Autoantibodies in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Autoimmunity Highlights, 2020(11): 1–8.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yoo H, Hino T, Hwang J, et al., 2022, Connective Tissue Disease-related Interstitial Lung Disease (CTD-ILD) and Interstitial Lung Abnormality (ILA): Evolving Concept of CT Findings, Pathology and Management. European Journal of Radiology Open, 2022(9): 100419.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Janczyk W, Bierla JB, Trojanowska I, et al., 2023, Prevalence and Significance of Autoantibody Seropositivity in Children with Wilson’s Disease. Diagnostics, 13(4): 768.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yeo AL, Kandane-Rathnayake R, Koelmeyer R, et al., 2024, SMART-SLE: Serology Monitoring and Repeat Testing in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Analysis of Anti-double-stranded DNA Monitoring. Rheumatology, 63(2): 525–533.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Dillon CF, Weisman MH, Miller FW, 2020, Population-based Estimates of Humoral Autoimmunity from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (1960–2014). PLoS One, 15(1): e0226516.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hasan SS, Shaikh A, Ochani RK, et al., 2021, Perception and Practices Regarding Cannabis Consumption in Karachi, Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 20(3): 471–489.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20" content-type="article"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Latif S, Saeed M, 2023, Hematological and Inflammatory Parameters in Hookah Smokers and Nonsmokers: A Cross-sectional Study. Journal of University College of Medicine and Dentistry, 2(1): 26–30.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21" content-type="article"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Deng X, Sun S, Yao W, et al., 2024, The Association between Three Prevalent Autoimmune Disorders and the Likelihood of Developinge Prostate Cancer: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Scientific Reports, 14(1): 11755.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
