<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCNR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Clinical and Nursing Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-3685</issn><eissn>2208-3693</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcnr.v9i1.9501</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Study on the Efficacy of Radiofrequency and Laser Ablation in the Treatment of Superficial Varicose Veins in the Lower Extremities</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCNR/9/1/10.26689/jcnr.v9i1.9501</url><author>WangQingshan</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-02-13</published-time></date></history><abstract>Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser ablation (EVLA) in the treatment of superficial varicose veins of the lower extremities. Methods: Seventy-eight patients with superficial varicose veins treated at a hospital between April 2022 and May 2023 were selected and divided into a radiofrequency ablation group (RFA group; 39 cases) and a laser ablation group (EVLA group; 39 cases) based on the treatment method. Operation time, postoperative recovery duration, venous clinical severity score (VCSS) changes, complication rates, closure rates, and recurrence rates were compared between the groups at 1 month, 3 months, and 12 months postoperatively. The postoperative therapeutic outcomes were comprehensively evaluated. Results: No significant differences in age, gender, disease grade, or disease course were observed between the groups (P &amp;gt; 0.05). The superficial varicose vein closure rate was 100% in both groups at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. At 12 months, the closure rate was 94.87% in the RFA group and 97.43% in the EVLA group, with no statistically significant difference (P &amp;gt; 0.05). No significant differences were observed in VCSS changes or complication incidence between the groups (P &amp;gt; 0.05). Conclusion: Radiofrequency ablation and laser ablation demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety in the treatment of superficial varicose veins of the lower extremities.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Raetz J, Wilson M, Collins K, 2019, Varicose Veins: Diagnosis and Treatment. Am Fam Physician, 99(11): 682–688.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Baccellieri D, Ardita V, Carta N, et al., 2020, Anterior Accessory Saphenous Vein Confluence Anatomy at the Sapheno-Femoral Junction as Risk Factor for Varicose Veins Recurrence After Great Saphenous Vein Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation. Int Angiol, 39(2): 105–111. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.20.04271-6</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Westin GG, Cayne NS, Lee V, et al., 2020, Radiofrequency and Laser Vein Ablation for Patients Receiving Warfarin Anticoagulation is Safe, Effective, and Durable. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 8(4): 610–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.11.013</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lurie F, Passman M, Meisner M, et al., 2020, The 2020 Update of the CEAP Classification System and Reporting Standards. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 8(3): 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.12.075. Erratum in J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 9(1): 288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.11.002</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kumar P, Khan IA, Das A, et al., 2022, Chronic Venous Disease. Part 1: Pathophysiology and Clinical Features. Clin Exp Dermatol, 47(7): 1228–1239. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.15143</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen T, Liu P, Zhang C, et al., 2024, Pathophysiology and Genetic Associations of Varicose Veins: A Narrative Review. Angiology, 2024: 33197241227598. https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197241227598</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zan S, Contessa L, Varetto G, et al., 2007, Radiofrequency Minimally Invasive Endovascular Treatment of Lower Limbs Varicose Veins: Clinical Experience and Literature Review. Minerva Cardioangiol, 55(4): 443–458.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Narula S, Sivakumar M, Nerantzakis G, et al., 2023, Comparative Analysis of Long-Term Efficacy, Safety, and Complications of Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Endovenous Laser Treatment of Varicose Veins. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 77(4): 44S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2023.01.125</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Mohammadi Tofigh A, Tahmasebi H, Zebarjadi J, 2020, Comparing the Success Rate and Side Effects of Endovenous Laser Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation to Treat Varicose Veins in the Lower Limbs: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Lasers Med Sci, 11(Suppl 1): S43–S48. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2020.S7</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Paravastu SC, Horne M, Dodd PD, 2016, Endovenous Ablation Therapy (Laser or Radiofrequency) or Foam Sclerotherapy Versus Conventional Surgical Repair for Short Saphenous Varicose Veins. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 11(11): CD010878. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010878.pub2</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Van den Bos R, Arends L, Kockaert M, et al., 2009, Endovenous Therapies of Lower Extremity Varicosities: A Meta-Analysis. J Vasc Surg, 49(1): 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.06.030</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Go SJ, Cho BS, Mun YS, et al., 2016, Study on the Long-Term Results of Endovenous Laser Ablation for Treating Varicose Veins. Int J Angiol, 25(2): 117–120. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1555749</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
