<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JCNR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Clinical and Nursing Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-3685</issn><eissn>2208-3693</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jcnr.v9i11.13008</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Development and Reliability and Validity Analysis of an Assessment Tool for Postoperative Wound Healing in Adult Patients with Benign Anal Canal and Rectal Diseases </title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JCNR/9/11/10.26689/jcnr.v9i11.13008</url><author>ChangXiaomei,HuShenglin,ZhuMin,ZouMin,LiMin,LiGuorong,FengZhi,LiHongbo</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>11</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-12-10</published-time></date></history><abstract>Objective: This study aims to develop an assessment tool for postoperative wound healing in adult patients with benign anal canal and rectal diseases and to validate its reliability and validity. Methods: Based on Levine’s Conservation Model as the theoretical framework, an item pool was formed through literature review, and the initial draft of the scale was refined through two rounds of Delphi expert consultation. A total of 200 postoperative patients were selected for item analysis, internal consistency testing, content validity, and structural validity analysis. Results: The final tool comprises four dimensions: energy conservation, structural integrity, personal integrity, and social integrity, with a total of 24 items. It demonstrates good content validity (I-CVI 0.82–1.00, S-CVI/Ave 0.95, S-CVI/UA 0.87) and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α for the overall scale was 0.934). Exploratory factor analysis revealed a KMO value of 0.931, Bartlett’s test of sphericity χ2 = 4147.853 (p &amp;lt; 0.001), and four common factors were extracted, accounting for a cumulative variance contribution rate of 64.345%, indicating ideal structural validity. Conclusion: The results indicate that the assessment tool has good reliability and validity and can systematically evaluate postoperative wound healing, providing a scientific basis for clinical individualized nursing interventions.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Jiang W, Zhang H, Sui N, et al., 2016, Epidemiological Investigation of Common Anorectal Diseases Among Urban Residents in China. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 32(10): 1293–1296.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cohee M, Hurff A, Gazewood J, 2020, Benign Anorectal Conditions: Evaluation and Management. American Family Physician, 101(1): 24–33.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen X, Shi D, Duan H, et al., 2020, Expert Consensus on the Management Standards for Wound Repair After Anorectal Surgery (2019 Edition). Journal of Practical Clinical Medicine, 24(04): 1–4.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Fromantin I, Watson S, Baffie A, et al., 2014, Prospective Descriptive Cohort Study of Malignant Wound Characteristics and Wound Care Strategies in Patients with Breast Cancer. Ostomy/Wound Management, 60(6): 38–48.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Schaefer K, 2014, Levine’s Conservation Model in Nursing Practice. Nursing Models: Utilization &amp; Application, 181–196.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Humphrey-Murto S, Wood T, Gonsalves C, et al., 2020, Delphi Method. Academic Medicine, 95(1): 168.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Shi J, Mo X, Sun Z, 2012, Content Validity Index in Scale Development. Journal of Central South University Medical Sciences, 37(2): 152–155.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Adamson K, Prion S, 2013, Reliability: Measuring Internal Consistency using Cronbach’s α. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(5): e179–e180.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Greatrex-White S, Moxey H, 2015, Wound Assessment Tools and Nurses’ Needs: An Evaluation Study. International Wound Journal, 12(3): 293–301.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang Z, Li C, Zhang J, et al., 2024, Nursing Care for a Patient with Extensive Skin Ulcers Caused by Epstein–Barr Virus-Positive T/NK Lymphoproliferative Disorder Using a Clinical Decision Support Tool Based on the TIME Principle. Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing, 40(31): 2461–2466.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
