<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JERA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Electronic Research and Application</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-3502</issn><eissn>2208-3510</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jera.v10i7.15650</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>A Risk-Adaptive TOPSIS Method for Electronic Decision Support in Vulnerable-Pedestrian Crossings</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JERA/10/7/10.26689/jera.v10i7.15650</url><author>LiZhuorui</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-08-14</published-time></date></history><abstract>Electronic decision support for vulnerable-pedestrian crossings requires heterogeneous factors, including crossing intention, individual vulnerability, traffic conditions, and roadside facilities, to be represented on a common scale. Fixed-weight multicriteria ranking cannot adapt its evaluation priorities to changes in scenario risk. This study proposes an electronic decision-support method that combines an intention-probability-driven risk model with risk-adaptive TOPSIS. The model integrates crossing-intention probability, vulnerability coefficient, traffic density, environmental adversity, and facility deficiency. A convex combination of baseline and scenario-dependent exponential weights produces a composite risk score, which continuously interpolates the TOPSIS criterion weights. The method ranks three intervention options and provides traceable intermediate results for human confirmation. In six reproducible simulated scenarios, the proposed method achieved a policy-level consistency rate of 100.0%, exceeding equal-weight and fixed-weight TOPSIS by 66.7 and 83.3 percentage points, respectively. Under ±10% weight perturbations, the mean preferred-option retention rate was 92.3%, and one risk evaluation and ranking required 31.8 ± 0.7 microseconds. The results show that the method adjusts evaluation priorities with scenario risk and generates intervention recommendations consistent with the predefined response level.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sharma N, Dhiman C, Indu S, 2022, Pedestrian Intention Prediction for Autonomous Vehicles: A Comprehensive Survey. Neurocomputing, 508: 120–152.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ling Y, Ma Z, 2024, Pedestrian Crossing Intention Prediction in the Wild: A Survey. CHAIN, 1(4): 263–279.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Landry G, Akhloufi A, 2025, Predicting Pedestrian Crossing Intention in Autonomous Vehicles: A Review. Neurocomputing, 618: 129105.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ma J, Rong W, 2022, Pedestrian Crossing Intention Prediction Method Based on Multi-Feature Fusion. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 13(8): 158.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen X, Zhang S, Li J, et al., 2024, Pedestrian Crossing Intention Prediction Based on Cross-Modal Transformer and Uncertainty-Aware Multi-Task Learning for Autonomous Driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(9): 12538–12549.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li H, Jin Y, Ren G, 2024, Interpretable Prediction of Pedestrian Crossing Intention: Fusion of Human Skeletal Information in Natural Driving Scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(11): 18153–18170.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang T W, Lai S H, 2023, Pedestrian Crossing Intention Prediction with Multi-Modal Transformer-Based Model. 2023 Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC): 1349–1356.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Xu L, You S, He G, et al., 2025, Pedestrian-Vehicle Information Modulation for Pedestrian Crossing Intention Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 10(3): 1919–1930.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yang B, Zhu J, Hu C, et al., 2024, Faster Pedestrian Crossing Intention Prediction Based on Efficient Fusion of Diverse Intention Influencing Factors. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 10(4): 9071–9087.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Liu H, Liu C, Chang F, et al., 2025, Long–Short Observation-Driven Prediction Network for Pedestrian Crossing Intention Prediction with Momentary Observation. Neurocomputing, 614: 128824.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen X, Xu W, Zhang S, et al., 2025, Pedestrian Crossing Intention Prediction via Progressive Multimodal Token Fusion for Autonomous Driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 26(9): 12959–12973.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen X, Zhang S, Xu W, et al., 2025, Robust Pedestrian Crossing Intention Prediction via Uncertainty-Guided Transformer Ensemble Network for Autonomous Driving. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 74: 1–13.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen H, Sun J, Liu Y, et al., 2025, Causal Confusion in Pedestrian Crossing Intention Prediction for Autonomous Vehicles: The Role of Ego-Vehicle Speed. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 26(8): 12224–12237.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zou H, Guo Y, Wei F, et al., 2025, A Pedestrian Group Crossing Intention Prediction Model Integrating Spatiotemporal Features. Scientific Reports, 15(1): 20675.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Gazzeh S, Presti L, Douik A, et al., 2025, Context-Ped: Multi-Modal Context Fusion for Pedestrian Crossing Intention Prediction. Machine Vision and Applications, 36(6): 132.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Shen X, Raksincharoensak P, 2022, Pedestrian-Aware Statistical Risk Assessment. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(7): 7910–7918.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhou S, Xu H, Zhang G, et al., 2024, Deep Learning-Based Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction and Risk Assessment at Signalized Intersections Using Trajectory Data Captured Through Roadside LiDAR. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 28(6): 793–805.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Schuetz E, Flohr F, 2023, A Review of Trajectory Prediction Methods for the Vulnerable Road User. Robotics, 13(1): 1.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sighencea B, Stanciu R, Căleanu C, 2021, A Review of Deep Learning-Based Methods for Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction. Sensors, 21(22): 7543.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20" content-type="article"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen K, Song X, Ren X, 2021, Modeling Social Interaction and Intention for Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 570: 125790.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21" content-type="article"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen C, 2021, A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach Based on ANP-Entropy TOPSIS for Building Materials Supplier Selection. Entropy, 23(12): 1597.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B22" content-type="article"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lamrini L, Abounaima M, Alaoui M T, 2023, New Distributed-TOPSIS Approach for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems in a Big Data Context. Journal of Big Data, 10(1): 97.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B23" content-type="article"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Storey V, Hevner A, Yoon V, 2024, The Design of Human-Artificial Intelligence Systems in Decision Sciences: A Look Back and Directions Forward. Decision Support Systems, 182: 114230.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B24" content-type="article"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Meyer J, 2024, Doing Artificial Intelligence (AI): Algorithmic Decision Support as a Human Activity. Decision, 11(4): 481–492.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
