<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JERA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Electronic Research and Application</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-3502</issn><eissn>2208-3510</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jera.v10i7.15828</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Simulation Study on the Crashworthiness of a Bridge Crane Anti-Collision Mechanism</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JERA/10/7/10.26689/jera.v10i7.15828</url><author>YanWenzhe,YanYufei,MaSiqun</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-08-11</published-time></date></history><abstract>A bridge-crane trolley may strike the end anti-collision device after overtravel, braking failure, or control delay; therefore, the collision resistance of the device directly affects operational safety. In this study, a shell-based finite-element model of a bridge-crane anti-collision mechanism was developed in HyperMesh, and explicit impact simulations were conducted in LS-DYNA at trolley speeds of 25 and 35 m/min. Each simulation covered 80 ms, and sliding energy, hourglass energy, added mass, stress, and displacement were examined. The sliding- and hourglass-energy ratios remained below 5%, and the added mass stayed below 1% in both cases. At 25 m/min, the maximum von Mises stress was 342.294 MPa, slightly below the 345 MPa yield strength of Q345 steel. At 35 m/min, the maximum stress increased to 429.190 MPa and exceeded the yield strength. These findings provide a basis for strength verification, end-zone speed limitation, and structural improvement of bridge-crane anti-collision mechanisms.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang J, Qiang B, He Z, et al., 2019, Sliding Mode Control for Overhead Crane System Based on an Improved Nonlinear Reaching Law. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 40(7): 148–152 + 175.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Jiao H, Zhou Q, Li Y, et al., 2015, Structural Model Test of Lightweight Girder of Bridge Crane. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 51(23): 168–174.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhao S, Lin F, Li Y, 2014, Collision-Energy Attenuation Characteristics of an Automotive Energy-Absorbing Bumper. Noise and Vibration Control, 34(6): 102–106.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Belytschko T, Ong J, Liu W, et al., 1984, Hourglass Control in Linear and Nonlinear Problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 43(3): 251–276.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hambali A, Sapuan S, Ismail N, et al., 2010, Material Selection of Polymeric Composite Automotive Bumper Beam Using Analytical Hierarchy Process. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 17(2): 244–256.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Olovsson L, Simonsson K, Unosson M, 2005, Selective Mass Scaling for Explicit Finite Element Analyses. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 63(10): 1436–1445.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hu Y, Liu C, Zhang J, et al., 2015, Research on Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Bumper Beam Subjected to Low-Velocity Frontal Impact. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 7(6): 1687814015589458.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Marzbanrad J, Alijanpour M, Kiasat M, 2009, Design and Analysis of an Automotive Bumper Beam in Low-Speed Frontal Crashes. Thin-Walled Structures, 47(8–9): 902–911.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Tarlochan F, Samer F, Hamouda A, et al., 2013, Design of Thin Wall Structures for Energy Absorption Applications: Enhancement of Crashworthiness Due to Axial and Oblique Impact Forces. Thin-Walled Structures, 71: 7–17.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Belingardi G, Beyene A, Koricho E, et al., 2015, Alternative Lightweight Materials and Component Manufacturing Technologies for Vehicle Frontal Bumper Beam. Composite Structures, 120: 483–495.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
