<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JWA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of World Architecture</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-3480</issn><eissn>2208-3499</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/jwa.v9i2.10315</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Integrating Academic Research Methodologies like Participatory Action Research (PAR) into Design Thinking: A Framework for Group Housing Design</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/JWA/9/2/10.26689/jwa.v9i2.10315</url><author>KumarTadiboina Samantha,SrikondaProf, Dr. Ramesh</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-04-28</published-time></date></history><abstract>The integration of academic research methodologies into design thinking processes presents a transformative approach to addressing complex challenges in group housing, fostering inclusive, sustainable, and user-centered solutions. This research explores how methodologies such as Participatory Action Research, post-occupancy evaluations, and Research through Design can be systematically embedded within design thinking to bridge the gap between academic rigor and empathy-driven, iterative design practices. By synthesizing these paradigms, the study proposes a framework for group housing design that prioritizes co-design processes, empathy-based data collection, and participatory evaluation, while emphasizing adaptability through sociocultural insights and user feedback. Case studies analysis demonstrate the effectiveness of flexible, community-driven design, while emerging technologies like IoT-enabled cohousing signal new opportunities for innovation. Challenges, including scalability, long-term validation, and reconciling user autonomy with professional expertise, are critically analyzed. Ultimately, this research advances a hybrid methodology to redefine the conceptualization, implementation, and assessment of group housing, offering actionable pathways to achieve affordable, inclusive, and context-sensitive housing solutions.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Marvaldi R, Pani E, 2016, Project Strategies and Evaluation Methods for Contemporary Social Housing. The Plan Journal, 1(1): 2–15. https://doi.org/10.15274/TPJ.2016.01.01.02</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Nix E, Paulose J, Wilkinson P, et al., 2018, Participatory Action Research as a Framework for Transdisciplinary Collaboration: A Pilot Study on Healthy, Sustainable, Low-Income Housing in Delhi, India. Global Challenges, 2(12): 1800054. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201800054</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Collina L, Sabatino PD, Mastrantoni C, et al., 2018, Designing Spaces and Services: An Experimental Project for Students’ Dorms. Semantic Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/07dd25faf92cd10ecdbe3e21a22113b9608332f6</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Radtke R, 2018, Experiential Learning in Campus Evaluation: Integrated Design Research Methodologies. Journal of Learning Spaces, 7(1): 1–14. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ab1632463b82c35c5d2d8e2cd98321f1c6a8336</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Whitzman C, 2017, Participatory Action Research in Affordable Housing Partnerships: Collaborative Rationality, or Sleeping With the Growth Machine? Planning Practice and Research, 32(5): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2017.1372245</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Demirel A, Alkhalaf MNA, 2022, Evaluating the Role of Participation in Different Design Phases for More Inclusive Housing. IDEALKENT, 13(38): 45–67. https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.1138659</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Olson C, Stuart WG, Walsh W, et al., 2024, Program Evaluation and Improvement by a Homeless Community Using a Human-Centered Design Approach. Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 5(1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.92256</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Heslop J, 2020, Learning Through Building: Participatory Action Research and the Production of Housing. Housing Studies, 35(7): 1203–1225. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1732880</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bukovszki V, Doci G, Reith A, 2021, Coding Engines in Participatory Social Housing Design—A Case to Revisit Pattern Languages. Sustainability, 13(6): 3367. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13063367</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Barros RRMP, Pina S, 2012, The Unfinished Symphony of Collective Housing: Lessons From PREVI Towards an Architecture of Possibilities. Ambiente Construido, 12(3): 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-86212012000300002</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Tovivich S, 2011, Architecture for the Urban Poor, the ‘New Professionalism’ of ‘Community Architects’ and the Implications for Architectural Education: Reflections on Practice From Thailand, thesis, Thailand. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2679ec2363ea6a6f858a73b9a04eb924f31a5ff3</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Fatima S, Corser R, Hunter J, 2022, Participatory Approaches to Communal Gathering Design in Homeless Shelter Villages. SPACE International Journal of Conference Proceedings, 2(1): 38–52. https://doi.org/10.51596/sijocp.v2i1.38</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Seong K, Sitabkhan S, Vakilian SH, et al., 2024, Micro-Intervention and Co-Creation at a Family Shelter. 112th ACSA Annual Meeting Proceedings, 104–120. https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.112.104</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ivett L, Gillick A, 2016, Constructing Community: Synthesizing Lay and Professional Knowledge in Architecture. Semantic Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b546737bd0f4b26c9953906a3e0929b83ff7d90</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>McNelis S, 2016, Researching Housing in a Global Context: New Directions in Some Critical Issues. Housing, Theory and Society, 33(4): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2016.1167121</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Jenkins T, 2021, Cohousing IoT: Technology Design for Life in Community. Multimodal Technology and Interaction, 5(3): 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/MTI5030014</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ronald R, 2011, Ethnography and Comparative Housing Research. International Journal of Housing Policy, 11(3): 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2011.626605</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Agyefi-Mensah S, Kpamma ZE, Hagan DD, 2020, Residential Adaptations as Users’ Tacit Means of Communicating Spatial Needs in Housing Design. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(3): 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-03-2019-0073</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Webber B, 2018, Big House: Co-Living Design for Transitional Housing, thesis, Victoria University of Wellington. https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.20388345</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20" content-type="article"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Christopoulos N, 2019, Towards a More Human-Oriented, Socially Driven Architecture. Semantic Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/959def3840b85a6fe253863b7f320ee815f53723</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21" content-type="article"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Natu A, 2020, Integrating Behavioral Research in Undergraduate Design Studio in Architecture for Designing Inclusive Environments. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 10(2): 231–250. https://doi.org/10.17411/JACCES.V10I2.231</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B22" content-type="article"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hilmer L, 2020, Participatory Housing – Segal’s Self-Build Method. Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference, 2: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385156</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B23" content-type="article"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pira M, Fleet G, Moir R, 2024, Design Thinking for Social Change: Exploring Stakeholder Collaboration in Poverty Alleviation. Journal of Sustainability Research, 6(1): 37–52. https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20240037</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B24" content-type="article"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rozewski R, 2019, The Walls We Put Up – Loneliness and Belonging in Urban Co-Living, thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University. https://doi.org/10.25772/8YM4-TR89</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
